IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/78243.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Der ökonomische Fußabdruck der Privaten Krankenversicherung in Deutschland. Untersuchung der PKV als Finanzier von Gesundheitsleistungen
[The economic footprint of private health insurance in Germany. Examining its role as healthcare financier]

Author

Listed:
  • Ostwald, Dennis A.
  • Legler, Benno
  • Haaf, Andreas
  • Schwärzler, Marion Cornelia

Abstract

There is now much evidence for the vital importance of the health economy, and it is receiving more attention from social and political spheres. This development is evidenced, not least, by the increased perception of the health economy as a key economic factor in Germany. Private health insurance (PKV) plays an important role in the health economy in three respects: as an economic actor, as a financer of healthcare services, and as a provider of capital. In a first step, an earlier study determined the economic footprint of the private health insurance sector as an economic actor. In doing so, the economic significance of private health insurance was measured on the basis of official national accounts categories for the first time. The starting point for this earlier study was a change of perspective so as to view the health economy – including private health insurance – not just as a cost factor, but also from the angle of economic growth and employment. From this basis, the second step presented here measures the economic importance of private health insurance in its role as a financer of healthcare services. Unlike in the first step, the private health insurance sector’s expenditure on benefits for its members forms the subject of the study, instead of the economic activity of the sector. This expenditure finances medication and services rendered to private patients by licensed doctors and hospitals, for example. The aim of this study is to calculate the resultant gross value added and employment. The comprehensive economic footprint approach is unique in that it incorporates the economic significance of intermediate inputs (indirect effects) and the spending of employee compensation (induced effects). This study augments this approach by examining the economic effects of the additional revenue raised from private patients. Additional revenue is the sum that the entire health system would lose if private patients were insured under the statutory scheme instead of privately. This issue is relevant seeing as there is currently some debate about introducing a universal system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ostwald, Dennis A. & Legler, Benno & Haaf, Andreas & Schwärzler, Marion Cornelia, 2017. "Der ökonomische Fußabdruck der Privaten Krankenversicherung in Deutschland. Untersuchung der PKV als Finanzier von Gesundheitsleistungen [The economic footprint of private health insurance in Germa," MPRA Paper 78243, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:78243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/78243/1/MPRA_paper_78243.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ranscht, Anja, 2009. "Quantifizierung regionaler Wachstums- und Beschäftigungseffekte der Gesundheitswirtschaft : am Beispiel ausgewählter Metropolregionen," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 34095, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schulze Ehring, Frank, 2018. "Arbeitsplätze und Beschäftigungswirkungen im und durch das System der Privaten Krankenversicherung (PKV): Kommentierter Literatur-Review unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Transformationsmodellen z," MPRA Paper 86506, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schwärzler, Marion Cornelia & Kronenberg, Tobias, 2017. "Basic Results of the Multiregional Health Account for Germany - Validation of Indirect Effects of the Health Economy," MPRA Paper 80719, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Schwärzler, Marion Cornelia & Kronenberg, Tobias, 2017. "Methodology of the Multiregional Health Account for Germany - An Iterative Algorithm-Based Multiregionalization Approach of Supply and Use Tables with Emphasis on Health," MPRA Paper 80712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ostwald, Dennis A. & Legler, Benno & Schwärzler, Marion Cornelia, 2016. "Der ökonomische Fußabdruck der Privaten Krankenversicherung in Deutschland. Quantifizierung der volkswirtschaftlichen Bedeutung der PKV im Kontext der Gesundheitswirtschaftlichen Gesamtrechnung (GGR) ," MPRA Paper 76743, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Schwärzler, Marion Cornelia & Kronenberg, Tobias, 2017. "Application of the Multiregional Health Account for Germany - A financial equalization scheme to cope with lagging investments in German hospitals," MPRA Paper 80720, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gesundheitswirtschaft; Private Krankenversicherung; Gesundheitswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnung; ökonomischer Fußabdruck; Input-Output-Analyse; Gesundheitsleistungen; Mehrumsätze;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • E01 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:78243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.