IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/66820.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Egyptian Agricultural Exports Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Soliman, Ibrahim
  • Bassiony, Hala

Abstract

The study dealt with the competitiveness of Egypt’s agricultural exports for the major commodity groups: Meat and meat preparations, Dairy products and bird eggs, Cereals and cereals preparations, Vegetables and Fruits, Sugar, sugar preparations and honey, Feeding stuff of animals, Beverages, Tobacco, Oils and fats, and Textile fiber and their waste. The study has not restricted the estimated measure of the competitiveness to only the classical Revealed Comparative Advantage Index (RCA), it applied the other elaborated indices, in order to avoid unfavorable conclusions due to policy distortions and/or the export (supply) pattern and the Import (demand) pattern of the specified commodities. The relative export advantage index, [Ln(RXA)], results coincided with the RCA results in all food groups, which means that the “policy induced distortions” had the same impact on all studied food groups. The RTA (Relative Trade Advantage) and RC (Revealed Competitiveness) indices consist with the real world economic phenomenon of two ways trade, i.e. the price and quantity differences of exports and imports. If exports share in the world market either surpassed much the imports, due to the price (quality), quantity (magnitude), or if both were too small (the case of oils and fats) then the results of RTA and RC would be quite different but more reliable than RCA. The study provided evidences for such conclusion. It seems that RC gives the most reliable results, as it considers the resultant from both values of exports and the percent of imports covered by the exports. Thereof, RC introduced vegetables and fruits to the front of competitiveness of Egypt's exports, as such group showed the highest value of exports and the second order of the (Exports/Imports) %. It was followed by textiles and fiber crops at the second order of the exports value but the first order with respect to (Exports/Imports) %. Although the exports value of beverages group came at the fourth order after cereals and preparations, dairy products and Eggs and sugar products, it surpassed much all of them as (Exports/Imports) %, which was around 168%, while it was 20%, 18% and 5% for the other three groups. Thereof, both RTA and RC ranked sugar products as number 4 with respect to the comparative advantage. The analysis showing that the (Exports/Imports)% is the dominant criteria in ranking the agro-food groups according to the competitiveness and that RC is the most sensitive index, particularly when we go gradually down to the agro-food groups with smaller and smaller export values. Therefore, it looks reasonable, to see dairy products (Exports/Imports) of about 18% comes number 5 followed by cereals of (Exports/Imports)% around 5%, where RTA, as it gives more importance to the volume of exports, ranked them in an opposite order. The best -fitted ARIMA model applied for Egyptian Fruits and Vegetables Exports was (0, 1, 1). Forecasting results implies that the comparative export advantage of Egyptian Fruits and Vegetables to the world market seems to decrease over the forthcoming decade. The best-fitted ARIMA model applied for Egyptian Textile and Fiber Exports was (0, 0, 1). Forecasting results implies that the comparative export advantage of Egyptian textiles and fiber crops to the world market seems to decrease over the forthcoming decade. The best-fitted ARIMA model applied for Egyptian Sugars and Honey exports was (1, 1, 2). Forecasting results implies that the comparative export advantage of Egypt in Sugar and Honey (Sugar processed products) to the world market seems to increase slightly over the forthcoming decade, with moderate fluctuations

Suggested Citation

  • Soliman, Ibrahim & Bassiony, Hala, 2012. "Egyptian Agricultural Exports Competitiveness," MPRA Paper 66820, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:66820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/66820/2/MPRA_paper_66820.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luca DE BENEDICTIS & Massimo TAMBERI, 2002. "A note on the Balassa Index of Revealed Comparative Advantage," Working Papers 158, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    2. Juergen Donges & James Riedel, 1977. "The expansion of manufactured exports in developing countries: An empirical assessment of s upply and demand issues," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 113(1), pages 58-87, March.
    3. Hatab, Assem Abu, 2009. "Performance of Egyptian Cotton Exports in International Market," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 22(2), July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hatab, Assem Abu & Nsabimana, Aimable, 2016. "A Dynamic Analysis of Egyptian Orange Exports to Russia: A Co-integration Analysis," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(2), June.
    2. Soliman, Ibrahim & Mashhour, Ahmed, 2014. "Techno-Economic Factors Affecting Genetic Investment in Dairy Cattle in Egypt," MPRA Paper 66777, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Unknown, 2014. "The new EU agricultural policy - continuation or revolution?," Multiannual Program Reports 179498, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fertő, Imre & Hubbard, Lionel J., 2005. "Az agrárkereskedelem dinamikája - A csatlakozó országok esete [The dynamics of agri-food trade patterns - the accession countries case]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 24-38.
    2. khalifah, noor, 1995. "Dynamic Comparative Advantage of the Asean Countries," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 29, pages 131-159.
    3. Falkowski Krzysztof, 2017. "Long-Term Comparative Advantages of the Eurasian Economic Union Member States in International Trade," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 53(4), pages 27-49, December.
    4. Depetris Guiguet, Edith & García Arancibia, Rodrigo & Rossini, Gustavo, 2010. "Consistencia de indicadores de especialización en el comercio internacional. Aplicación al caso de la mantequilla en Argentina y Uruguay = Consistency of Specialization Indicators. An Application to A," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 9(1), pages 85-105, June.
    5. Arye Hillman, 1980. "Observations on the relation between “revealed comparative advantage” and comparative advantage as indicated by pre-trade relative prices," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 116(2), pages 315-321, June.
    6. Danna-Buitrago, Jenny Paola & Stellian, Rémi, 2022. "Which revealed comparative advantage index to choose? Theoretical and empirical considerations," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    7. Roberto Álvarez & Ricardo A. López, 2008. "Trade Liberalization and Industry Dynamics: A Difference in Difference Approach," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 470, Central Bank of Chile.
    8. Stefania BUSSOLETTI & Roberto ESPOSTI, 2004. "Regional Convergence, Structural Funds and the Role of Agricolture in the EU. A Panel-Data Approach," Working Papers 220, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    9. Ugo Fratesi, 2003. "Innovation Diffusion and the Evolution of Regional Disparities," ERSA conference papers ersa03p327, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Céline CARRERE & Marco FUGAZZA & Marcelo OLARREAGA & Frédéric ROBERT-NICOUD, 2014. "Trade in Unemployment," Working Papers P101, FERDI.
    11. Thomas Vollrath, 1991. "A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 127(2), pages 265-280, June.
    12. Štefan Bojnec & Imre Fertő, 2008. "European Enlargement and Agro‐Food Trade," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 563-579, December.
    13. Anna Vladimirovna Belova & Luboš Smutka & Eva Rosochatecká, 2012. "World chicken meat market - its development and current status," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(4), pages 15-30.
    14. repec:zbw:bofitp:2004_019 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. repec:ilo:ilowps:248521 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Andrey A. Gnidchenko & Vladimir A. Salnikov, 2021. "Trade Intensity, Net Trade, and Revealed Comparative Advantage," HSE Working papers WP BRP 244/EC/2021, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    17. Athanasoglou Panagiotis & Backinezos Constantina & Evagelia A. Georgiou, 2010. "Export performance, competitiveness and commodity composition," Working Papers 114, Bank of Greece.
    18. Andrey A. Gnidchenko & Vladimir A. Salnikov, 2015. "Net Comparative Advantage Index: Overcoming the Drawbacks of the Existing Indices," HSE Working papers WP BRP 119/EC/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    19. Doucha, Tomáš & Pohlová, Karina, 2013. "Czech Agricultural Trade After EU Accession as a Reflexion of the Competitiveness of Czech Agriculture and Food Industry Under the EU Single Market and Changes in WTO Commitments," 135th Seminar, August 28-30, 2013, Belgrade, Serbia 160380, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Elvio MATTIOLI, 2003. "The measurement of coherence in the evaluation of criteria and its effects or ranking problems illustrated using a multicriteria decision method," Working Papers 199, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    21. Veselin Hadzhiev, 2014. "Overall Revealed Comparative Advantages," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 2(1), pages 47-53.
    22. Vinokurov, Evgeny, 2007. "Kaliningrad: Enclaves and Economic Integration," MPRA Paper 20937, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Egypt; EGYPTIAN AGRICULTURAL EXPORTS; EGYPTIAN EXPORTS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F17 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Forecasting and Simulation
    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:66820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.