IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/6572.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The territorial dimension of the Common Agricultural and Rural Development policy (CAP) and its relation to cohesion objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Dax, Thomas
  • Hovorka, Gerhard

Abstract

An increasing focus on rural development issues has characterised the discussion of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform. This reflects new societal demands for tasks and services provided by agriculture particularly in mountain and less-favoured areas (LFA). The regional distribution of CAP and Rural Development support underpins the argument that the territorial dimension implied by CAP reforms has not yet been taken sufficiently into account. The regional variation in the distribution of the LFA scheme between member states testifies this imbalance and underscores country specific priorities. LFAs will have to prove that they are more than a compensation measure, but already providing a range of multifunctional tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Dax, Thomas & Hovorka, Gerhard, 2007. "The territorial dimension of the Common Agricultural and Rural Development policy (CAP) and its relation to cohesion objectives," MPRA Paper 6572, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Jan 2008.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:6572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6572/1/MPRA_paper_6572.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogdanov, Natalija, 2014. "The development of support for less favoured areas and deprivileged regions: challenge of agricultural policy in Serbia," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 186679, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    territorial impact; rural development; less-favoured areas; LFA scheme; CAP reform;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • R5 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:6572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.