IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/59636.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A note on loadings and deductibles: can a vicious circle arise?

Author

Listed:
  • Luciano, elisa

Abstract

In a recently reprinted paper Borch wonders whether an increase in loadings, together with a consequent increase in deductibles, may start a vicoius circle, ad infinitum. This paper rules out the possibility of a vicious circle, in a model à la Borch. First of all, in his setting, increases in costs are not necessarily followed by increases in loadings. Second, increases in loadings are not necessarily followed by increases in deductibles, since in equilibrium insurance may be Giffen. Third, loadings do not increase with deductibles, because the only viable equilibrium is a Stackelberg one.

Suggested Citation

  • Luciano, elisa, 1999. "A note on loadings and deductibles: can a vicious circle arise?," MPRA Paper 59636, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:59636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59636/1/MPRA_paper_59636.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dionne, Georges & Eeckhoudt, Louis, 1984. "Insurance and saving: some further results," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 101-110, April.
    2. Borch, Karl, 1975. "Optimal Insurance Arrangements," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 284-290, September.
    3. MOSSIN, Jan, 1968. "Aspects of rational insurance purchasing," LIDAM Reprints CORE 23, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Raviv, Artur, 1979. "The Design of an Optimal Insurance Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 84-96, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dionne, Georges & Harrington, Scott, 2017. "Insurance and Insurance Markets," Working Papers 17-2, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    2. Kaluszka, Marek, 2004. "An extension of Arrow's result on optimality of a stop loss contract," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 527-536, December.
    3. Aase, Knut K., 2007. "Wealth Effects on Demand for Insurance," Discussion Papers 2007/6, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    4. Li, Wenyuan & Tan, Ken Seng & Wei, Pengyu, 2021. "Demand for non-life insurance under habit formation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PA), pages 38-54.
    5. Henri Loubergé, 1998. "Risk and Insurance Economics 25 Years After," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 23(4), pages 540-567, October.
    6. Boonen, Tim J. & Liu, Fangda, 2022. "Insurance with heterogeneous preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Richard Peter, 2024. "The economics of self-protection," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 49(1), pages 6-35, March.
    8. Giora Harpaz, 1986. "Optimal Risk—Sharing Policies," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 30(2), pages 37-40, October.
    9. Chi, Yichun & Zheng, Jiakun & Zhuang, Shengchao, 2022. "S-shaped narrow framing, skewness and the demand for insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 279-292.
    10. Flåm, Sjur Didrik, 2002. "Full Coverage for Minor, Recurrent Losses?," Working Papers in Economics 10/02, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    11. Neil A. Doherty & Christian Laux & Alexander Muermann, 2015. "Insuring Nonverifiable Losses," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 19(1), pages 283-316.
    12. Chi, Yichun & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2022. "Regret-based optimal insurance design," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 22-41.
    13. Chi, Yichun & Tan, Ken Seng & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2020. "A Bowley solution with limited ceded risk for a monopolistic reinsurer," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 188-201.
    14. Alexis Louaas & Pierre Picard, 2021. "Optimal insurance coverage of low-probability catastrophic risks," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 46(1), pages 61-88, March.
    15. Jiakun Zheng, 2020. "Optimal insurance design under narrow framing," Post-Print hal-04227370, HAL.
    16. Zheng, Jiakun, 2020. "Optimal insurance design under narrow framing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 596-607.
    17. Rachel J. Huang & Larry Y. Tzeng, 2006. "The design of an optimal insurance contract for irreplaceable commodities," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 31(1), pages 11-21, July.
    18. Ghossoub, Mario, 2019. "Budget-constrained optimal insurance without the nonnegativity constraint on indemnities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 22-39.
    19. Joseph C. Hartman & Kamonkan Laksana, 2009. "Designing and pricing menus of extended warranty contracts," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(3), pages 199-214, April.
    20. Rachel J. Huang & Larry Y. Tzeng, 2007. "Optimal Tax Deductions for Net Losses Under Private Insurance With an Upper Limit," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 74(4), pages 883-893, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    deductibles; insurance; loadings; Stackelberg equilibrium;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:59636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.