IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/123022.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Project NeoWave: A Comparative Analysis of Conservatism and Gender Dynamics Impacting Women and Families in the USA and India Since 2010, with Policy Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Gupta, Shivansh

Abstract

This study examines the impact of conservative ideologies on gender dynamics in the USA and India since 2010, focusing on their effects on women and families. Using qualitative and quantitative methods, the research explores how conservative movements, policies, and cultural norms have influenced gender roles and expectations. Data collection includes an extensive literature review and policy analysis, defining conservatism in each country and highlighting its ties to profit-driven ideologies, traditional gender roles, and systemic oppression. The study traces the historical evolution of conservatism in India and the USA, analyzing factors such as religion, post-colonialism, male dominance, economic conditions, and cultural influences. It examines key events shaping gender equality and the current state of conservatism, with a focus on the BJP’s policies in India and the Republican Party's influence during the Trump administration in the USA. These analyses underscore conservatism’s role in shaping political representation, economic opportunities, and social norms, often reinforcing gender disparities. The research introduces Project NeoWave, a progressive framework representing the fifth wave of feminism. It explores themes such as nuanced women’s rights, new domesticity, and systemic changes to promote equality. By addressing the development of gender minorities, this movement critiques radical feminism while proposing innovative strategies for inclusivity. A comparative analysis identifies similarities and differences in conservatism’s impacts on gender dynamics in both nations, assessing employment opportunities, wage gaps, political representation, and the influence of religion and tradition. The study evaluates policies and initiatives aimed at mitigating gender disparities and highlights successful approaches. Recommendations focus on integrating Project NeoWave’s progressive principles with conservative values to develop effective, balanced policies. This research contributes to the discourse on conservatism and gender dynamics by providing a comprehensive framework for understanding these interactions. It offers actionable insights for policymakers, scholars, and advocates, fostering strategies to build a more equitable society.

Suggested Citation

  • Gupta, Shivansh, 2024. "Project NeoWave: A Comparative Analysis of Conservatism and Gender Dynamics Impacting Women and Families in the USA and India Since 2010, with Policy Recommendations," MPRA Paper 123022, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:123022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/123022/1/MPRA_paper_123022.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Williams & Ardiana Gashi, 2021. "Evaluating the wage differential between the formal and informal economy: a gender perspective," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(4), pages 735-750, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Shivansh & Blight, Meaghan, 2024. "Project NeoWave: A Comparative Analysis of Conservatism and Gender Dynamics Impacting Women and Families in the USA and India Since 2010, with Policy Recommendations," SocArXiv jp3ev, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Keywords: Conservative ideologies; Gender dynamics; Women and families; USA; India; Socio-political landscapes; Cultural norms; BJP policies; Trump administration; Project NeoWave; Fifth wave of feminism; Radical feminism; Comparative analysis; Policy recommendations; Gender minority development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • D1 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior
    • J4 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing
    • R2 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:123022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.