IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/122340.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Leveraging Clustering Algorithms in Defining Relevant Markets for Competition Policy Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kurdoglu, Berkay

Abstract

This study explores the critical role of market definition in antitrust and competition law, where defining the relevant market is fundamental for assessing competition between firms, products, and markets. Traditional methods for market definition, such as the SSNIP test, Critical Loss Analysis, and cross-elasticity of demand, rely on econometric models to evaluate substitutability and price sensitivity. However, these models face limitations, including challenges with endogeneity, data requirements, and the time-consuming nature of the process. Given these constraints, there is a growing interest in more efficient, data-driven approaches. This research delves into the use of clustering algorithms as a modern tool to enhance market definition in antitrust cases. By leveraging these advanced methods, the study aims to offer new insights into competitive landscapes and the evolving dynamics of market structures, contributing to a deeper understanding of rivalry relationships in both traditional and digital marketplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurdoglu, Berkay, 2023. "Leveraging Clustering Algorithms in Defining Relevant Markets for Competition Policy Analysis," MPRA Paper 122340, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:122340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/122340/1/MPRA_paper_122340.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Antitrust; Competition law; Market definition; Clustering algorithm;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D40 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - General
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L4 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:122340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.