IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/121910.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Polycrisis and Intensified Risks for Children: Analysing “Mission Vatsalya” Scheme in India

Author

Listed:
  • Chakraborty, Lekha
  • Kaur, Amandeep
  • B, Balamuraly
  • Yadav, Jitesh

Abstract

Recognizing the importance of “Nari Shakti” to provide ‘Women-Led Development for next 25 years', the Indian Finance Minister announced three important umbrella schemes to be implemented in mission mode, viz., Mission Poshan 2.0, Mission Shakti and Mission VATSALYA. Among the triad, Mission VATSALYA is a centrally sponsored scheme being implemented in India with a view of “Leave No Child Behind” to create an enabling environment for the children who are in need of care and protection, children in conflict with law and other vulnerable children. Against the backdrop of polycrisis, India delineates the rights and protections for children, within a comprehensive legal framework, ensuring that all children have equal access to the public provisioning of quality child protection services. We conduct the public expenditure and institutional review of Mission VATSALYA in Odisha across selected districts. Odisha has been fiscally prudent, adhering to the fiscal rules of maintaining a fiscal deficit-to-GSDP ratio of 3 percent, maintaining fiscal sustainability even in the post-pandemic years. However, aggregate fiscal sustainability is not sufficient to achieve child developmental outcomes. The district level inferences revealed that the volatility in the utilisation ratio of funds resulted in the suboptimal performance of the child care institutions. The analysis also revealed that there are deficiencies in implementation of child protection schemes in terms of infrastructure, personnel, and public provisioning of services in Odisha. However, the initiative to conduct periodic surveys to identify the vulnerable children – [categorising the districts into mining, conflict zones, disaster prone areas, and migration] and the digital infrastructure initiative for online portals for child protection are laudable. There are inter-district differentials in the identification of vulnerable children and their institutionalisation. These inferences has policy implications in terms of strengthening the non- institutional care component for the vulnerable children, along with enhanced quality of services and infrastructure in the existing child care institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakraborty, Lekha & Kaur, Amandeep & B, Balamuraly & Yadav, Jitesh, 2024. "Polycrisis and Intensified Risks for Children: Analysing “Mission Vatsalya” Scheme in India," MPRA Paper 121910, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/121910/1/MPRA_paper_121910.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jitesh Yadav & Lekha Chakraborty, 2022. "Efficacy of Public Financial Management in Reducing Crime against Children: Empirical Evidence from Subnational Governments in India," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_1009, Levy Economics Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chakraborty, Lekha & Kaur, Amandeep & Balamuraly B & Yadav, Jitesh, 2024. "Mission VATSALYA: A Public Expenditure and Institutional Review of Child Protection Scheme across Districts in Odisha, India," Working Papers 24/418, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    child budgeting ; public expenditure and institutional review; women-led development; polycrisis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • H76 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other Expenditure Categories
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:121910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.