IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/118744.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mixed data methods of estimating undeclared earnings, with application to Latvia

Author

Listed:
  • Hazans, Mihails

Abstract

This study develops two methods of estimating the proportion of envelope wage receivers and the share of envelope earnings in the wage bill. Both methods are applicable for the whole economy, as well as by sectors and by socio-economic groups, if some combination of survey and administrative earnings data is available. The Mixed Data Method (MDM) estimates envelope wages by comparing survey and administrative data for the same employee. In addition, MDM applies a matching procedure to produce estimates in cases of survey non-response. MDM is suitable for large survey datasets with integrated (or matched) administrative data, as is the case for the national versions of EU-SILC in many countries, including Latvia. According to the MDM estimates based on the Latvian EU-SILC, the average envelope share across all employees (including those declaring all earnings) dropped from 30% in 2007 to 23% in 2011-2012 and 21% in 2015-2016. The envelope share in the wage bill is higher for low-income workers, but the total amount of undeclared earnings is larger among high-income employees. The Distribution Matching Method (DMM) is less demanding in terms of data but provides only lower-bound estimates. DMM assumes that, for some measure of earnings and some set of intervals, administrative data on distribution of employees by officially declared earnings are available along with representative survey data on distribution of employees by total (declared plus undeclared) earnings. Completely informal employees should be either excluded from the survey or identifiable among respondents. In this case, DMM provides lower bounds for the share of registered employees receiving envelope wages. Moreover, the weighted average of sectoral, regional or age-specific lower bounds usually improves the economy-wide lower bound estimated directly.

Suggested Citation

  • Hazans, Mihails, 2019. "Mixed data methods of estimating undeclared earnings, with application to Latvia," MPRA Paper 118744, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:118744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/118744/1/MPRA_paper_118744.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Putniņš, Tālis J. & Sauka, Arnis, 2015. "Measuring the shadow economy using company managers," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 471-490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nino Kokashvili & Irakli Barbakadze & Ketevani Kapanadze, 2017. "How Participating In The Shadow Economy Affects The Growth Of Latvian Firms," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 101, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    2. Ligita Gasparėnienė & Rita Remeikienė & Colin C. Williams, 2022. "Unemployment and the Informal Economy," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-96687-4, April.
    3. Piotr Dybka & Bartosz Olesiński & Marek Rozkrut & Andrzej Torój, 2023. "Measuring the model uncertainty of shadow economy estimates," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 1069-1106, August.
    4. Nathapornpan Piyaareekul Uttama & Rapipong Promnart, 2022. "Shadow economy and the efficiency of FDI inflow: the case of ASEAN economies," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(2), pages 136-155.
    5. Dagmara Nikulin & Ewa Lechman, 2021. "Introductory Words," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Shadow Economy in Poland, chapter 0, pages 1-10, Springer.
    6. Anastasiya Luzgina, 2017. "Problems of corruption and tax evasion in construction sector in Belarus," Post-Print hal-01705894, HAL.
    7. Schneider Friedrich & Buehn Andreas, 2017. "Shadow Economy: Estimation Methods, Problems, Results and Open questions," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, March.
    8. Ioana Alexandra Horodnic & Colin C. Williams, 2016. "An evaluation of the shadow economy in Baltic states: a tax morale perspective," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(2/3), pages 339-358.
    9. Gavoille, Nicolas & Zasova, Anna, 2021. "Foreign ownership and labor tax evasion: Evidence from Latvia," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Jaanika Meriküll & Tairi Rõõm, 2020. "Stress Tests of the Household Sector Using Microdata from Survey and Administrative Sources," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 16(2), pages 203-248, March.
    11. Colin C. Williams & Ioana A. Horodnic, 2017. "Explaining participation in the undeclared economy in Central and Eastern Europe: a demand-side approach," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 297-312, July.
    12. Liga Jankova & Tamara Grizane & Inguna Jurgelane-Kaldava, 2019. "Business Activity In Latvia," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 13(1), pages 184-195.
    13. Monica Violeta Achim & Sorin Nicolae Borlea & Lucian Vasile Găban & Alin Adrian Mihăilă, 2019. "The Shadow Economy and Culture: Evidence in European Countries," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 352-374, September.
    14. Feige, Edgar L., 2015. "Reflections on the meaning and measurement of Unobserved Economies: What do we really know about the “Shadow Economy”?," MPRA Paper 68466, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Piotr Dybka & Bartosz Olesiński & Marek Rozkrut & Andrzej Torój, 2020. "Measuring the uncertainty of shadow economy estimates using Bayesian and frequentist model averaging," KAE Working Papers 2020-046, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis.
    16. Arezzo, Maria Felice & Horodnic, Ioana A. & Williams, Colin C. & Guagnano, Giuseppina, 2024. "Measuring participation in undeclared work in Europe using survey data: A method for resolving social desirability bias," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Florencia Verónica Pedroni & Anahí Briozzo & Gabriela Pesce, 2022. "Determinants of unreported income in Latin American companies: a business perspective," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 58-83.
    18. Folorunsho Monsuru Ajide & James Temitope Dada & Johnson Kolawole Olowookere, 2022. "Shadow economy and foreign direct investment in Nigerian manufacturing industry," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(2), pages 156-180.
    19. Kose, M. Ayhan & Elgin, Ceyhun & Ohnsorge, Franziska & Yu, Shu, 2021. "Understanding Informality," CEPR Discussion Papers 16497, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Barry Reilly & Gorana Krstić, 2019. "Shadow Economy - Is an Enterprise Survey a Preferable Approach?," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 66(5), pages 589-610.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    undeclared work; complete informality; envelope wages;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • J46 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Informal Labor Market

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:118744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.