IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/117618.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Demand Theory for Poverty and Affluence: A Contribution to Utility Theory

Author

Listed:
  • MILLER, ANNE

Abstract

Van Praag (1968) developed a multiplicative utility function, based on 'leaning S-shaped, bounded cardinal utilities', comprising increasing marginal utility initially, representing 'deprivation' first, then diminishing marginal utility representing 'sufficiency'. A new separability rule, based on the satisfaction of human needs, suggests when to multiply and when to add utilities. A functional form is derived to explore the theoretical effects of adding two S-shaped bounded cardinal utilities, yielding both convex- and concave-to-the-origin indifference curves, the latter defining 'dysfunctional poverty'. The convex-to-the-origin indifference curves potentially provide all of superior-normal, inferior-normal and Giffen responses. Each derived structural form, including labour supply, manifests a discontinuity, an envelope curve and high elasticises associated with deprivation. This provides an integrating framework for analysing utility and demand where the emphasis is on people and the satisfaction of needs, with applications in: housing health services, education, wellbeing; poverty and inequality studies; tax and benefit policy analysis; and behavioural economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Miller, Anne, 2023. "Demand Theory for Poverty and Affluence: A Contribution to Utility Theory," MPRA Paper 117618, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 13 Jun 2023.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:117618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/117618/1/MILLER%20DEM-UTIL-LAB%2BFigs%20May%202023.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohli, Ulrich, 1985. "Inverse demand and anti-giffen goods," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 397-404.
    2. Berg, Morten, 1987. "Giffen's Paradox Revisited," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 79-89, January.
    3. Peter G. Moffatt, 2012. "A Class of Indirect Utility Functions Predicting Giffen Behaviour," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Wim Heijman & Pierre Mouche (ed.), New Insights into the Theory of Giffen Goods, pages 127-141, Springer.
    4. Uriel Spiegel, 1997. "The Case of a Giffen Good: Reply," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 45-47, March.
    5. Biederman, Daniel K., 2015. "A strictly-concave, non-spliced, Giffen-compatible utility function," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 24-28.
    6. Dougan, William R, 1982. "Giffen Goods and the Law of Demand," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 90(4), pages 809-815, August.
    7. Christian E. Weber, 1997. "The Case of a Giffen Good: Comment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 36-44, March.
    8. ., 1997. "The rare case of a Giffen good?," Chapters, in: Puzzles and Paradoxes in Economics, chapter 13, pages 69-72, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Peter Sørensen, 2007. "Simple Utility Functions with Giffen Demand," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 31(2), pages 367-370, May.
    10. Davies, John E, 1994. "Giffen Goods, the Survival Imperative, and the Irish Potato Culture," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(3), pages 547-565, June.
    11. Blundell, Richard, 1988. "Consumer Behaviour: Theory and Empirical Evidence--a Survey," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 98(389), pages 16-65, March.
    12. Robert T. Jensen & Nolan H. Miller, 2008. "Giffen Behavior and Subsistence Consumption," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1553-1577, September.
    13. van Praag, Bernard M. S. & Kapteyn, Arie, 1994. "How sensible is the Leyden individual welfare function of income? A reply," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 1817-1825, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miller, Anne, 2024. "The Concept of Separate needs in Cardinal Utility Theory: A Functional Form for Added Leaning-S-shaped Utlities," MPRA Paper 121455, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Miller, Anne, 2022. "Demand theory for poverty and affluence," MPRA Paper 116144, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Yochanan Shachmurove & Janusz Szyrmer, 2011. "Sir Robert Giffen Meets Russia in Early 1990s," PIER Working Paper Archive 11-020, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    4. Miller, Anne, 2024. "The concept of separate needs in cardinal utility theory: the leisure-consumption choice," MPRA Paper 121671, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Landi, Massimiliano, 2015. "A class of symmetric and quadratic utility functions generating Giffen demand," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 50-54.
    6. Olli Salmensuu, 2021. "Potato Importance for Development Focusing on Prices," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Sproule, Robert A., 2020. "The delimitation of Giffenity for the Wold-Juréen (1953) utility function using relative prices: A note," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 14, pages 1-8.
    8. Massimiliano Landi, 2014. "A Class of Symmetric and Quadratic Utility Functions Generating Giffen Demand," Working Papers 21-2014, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    9. Zhu, Drew, 2016. "The Mechanism of Giffen Behaviour," MPRA Paper 75707, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Franks, Edwin & Bryant, William D.A., 2017. "The Uncompensated Law of Demand: A ‘Revealed Preference’ approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 105-111.
    11. Biederman, Daniel K., 2015. "A strictly-concave, non-spliced, Giffen-compatible utility function," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 24-28.
    12. Sproule, Robert, 2023. "The Anomalies Of The Wold-Juréen (1953) Functional Form In Overview," MPRA Paper 117835, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Sproule, Robert & Karras, Michael, 2022. "In Search of A Giffen Input: A Comprehensive Analysis of The Wold-Juréen (1953) Production Function," MPRA Paper 113007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Peter Moffatt & Keith Moffatt, 2011. "Mirror utility functions and reflexion properties of various classes of goods," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 031, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    15. Robert Sproule & Ambrose Leung, 2007. "Using the compensating and equivalent variations to define the Slutsky Equation under a discrete price change," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(11), pages 1-9.
    16. Le Van, Cuong & Pham, Ngoc-Sang, 2020. "Demand and equilibrium with inferior and Giffen behaviors," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 45-50.
    17. Junko Doi & Kazumichi Iwasa & Koji Shimomura, 2012. "Giffen Behavior Independent of the Wealth Level," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Wim Heijman & Pierre Mouche (ed.), New Insights into the Theory of Giffen Goods, pages 105-126, Springer.
    18. Di Vita, Giuseppe, 2001. "Are the outputs derived from secondary materials giffen goods?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 255-260, December.
    19. Sproule, Robert & Karras, Michael, 2022. "A Precondition-Free Demonstration That the Wold-Juréen (1953) Utility Function (Always) Generates a Giffen Good," MPRA Paper 113005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Michael V. White, 1990. "Invention in the Face of Necessity: Marshallian Rhetoric and the Giffen Good(s)," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 66(1), pages 1-11, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Increasing marginal utility; additive utilities; absolute poverty line; Giffen good; reservation wage.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:117618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.