IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/112191.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effects of Vegetation, Structure Density, and Wind on Structure Loss Rates in Recent Northern California Wildfires

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, James

Abstract

Analysis: Loss rates for single family homes threatened by wildfires in nine Northern California fires in the 2015-2021 time period are analyzed. 26,915 homes are included in the study. 21,504 of those homes were destroyed (79.8%). Vegetation cover is estimated for the area within 25 meters and within 500 meters of each structure point by reclassifying a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) image derived from high resolution infrared aerial imagery. Weather parameters for the maximum loss day on each fire are taken from the nearest Remote Automatic Weather Station (RAWS). Logistic regression is used to estimate the probability of structure loss, considering weather variables, vegetation cover, and structure patterns. Results: Structure density, vegetation cover within 25 meters and within 500 meters of a structure point, maximum wind levels and maximum temperature levels are all positively related to structure loss. Homes in high structure density areas (i.e., more than 400 structures per km2 within a 200-meter distance) have a predicted loss rate 20% higher than homes in low structure density areas, most likely due to increases in structure-to-structure spread. 33% of the losses in high structure density areas can be attributed to structure density compared to 13% of losses in the low structure density areas. Conclusions: Although reductions in vegetation cover do decrease structure loss rates, even very large changes in vegetation cover would not be sufficient to reduce loss rates to low levels. With a reduction of 50% in the average vegetation cover levels in both the 25-meter and 500-meter zones, predicted loss rates for these fires would still be over 50% for low structure density areas and nearly 80% for high structure density areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, James, 2022. "The Effects of Vegetation, Structure Density, and Wind on Structure Loss Rates in Recent Northern California Wildfires," MPRA Paper 112191, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:112191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112191/8/MPRA_paper_112191.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schmidt, James, 2020. "The Butte Fire: A Case Study in Using LIDAR Measures of Pre-Fire Vegetation to Estimate Structure Loss Rates," MPRA Paper 99699, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schmidt, James, 2023. "Defensible Space, Housing Density, and Diablo-North Wind Events: Impacts on Loss Rates for Homes in Northern California Wildfires," MPRA Paper 116166, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmidt, James, 2020. "Vegetation Cover and Structure Loss in Four Northern California Wildfires: Butte, Tubbs, Carr, and Camp," MPRA Paper 104232, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Defensible space; structure loss; wildfire; WUI; fuel reduction; radiant heat; structure density; embers; flames; fire prevention; NDVI; Sierra Nevada; Bay Area; wind; Northern California; Camp Fire; Tubbs Fire; Butte Fire; Dixie Fire; Caldor Fire; LNU Complex Fire; Claremont-Bear Fire; Carr Fire;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:112191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.