IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/por/fepwps/560.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hayek’s Scientism Essay and the social aspects of objectivity and the mind

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo de Melo Lourenço

    (FEP-UP)

Abstract

In his Scientism and the Study of Society, Hayek wishes to show the errors to which the moral scientist is led by emulating the methods of the natural sciences. The present paper argues that Hayek’s argument relies on a differentiation between the natural sciences and what he calls “ordinary experience” that is based on an unacceptable appearance-reality distinction and an implausible ontology. An alternative justification for the differentiation is offered by appealing to the manifold goals and social contexts of inquiry. Also, according to Hayek, the moral scientist needs to understand agents’ attitudes, and such understanding is possible because there is a similarity between the mind of the moral scientist and that of the agent. This paper tries to elucidate what Hayek thinks such similarity to be and how it may lead to the understanding of others. It proposes two alternatives: first, understanding as the projection of mental categories from behavioral evidence, and second, by looking forward to Hayek’s The Sensory Order, understanding as a functional correspondence between structures in the central nervous system.

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo de Melo Lourenço, 2015. "Hayek’s Scientism Essay and the social aspects of objectivity and the mind," FEP Working Papers 560, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    • Handle: RePEc:por:fepwps:560
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/wp560.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John B. Davis & D. W. Hands & Uskali Mäki (ed.), 1998. "The Handbook of Economic Methodology," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 741.
    2. Runde, Jochen, 2001. "Bringing Social Structure Back into Economics: On Critical Realism and Hayek's Scientism Essay," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 5-24, March.
    3. Hayek, F. A., 2010. "Studies on the Abuse and Decline of Reason," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226321127 edited by Caldwell, Bruce, Febrero.
    4. Caldwell, Bruce, 1994. "Hayek's Scientific Subjectivism," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 305-313, October.
    5. Robin Cowan & Mario J. Rizzo, 1996. "The Genetic‐Causal Tradition and Modern Economic Theory," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 273-317, August.
    6. Hayek, F. A., 2010. "Studies on the Abuse and Decline of Reason," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226321097 edited by Caldwell, Bruce, December.
    7. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226320625 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. ., 2010. "Introduction to corruption in the Persian Gulf," Chapters, in: Corruption and its Manifestation in the Persian Gulf, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mário Graça Moura, 2014. "Schumpeter and the meanings of rationality," FEP Working Papers 551, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    2. Scott Scheall, 2016. "A brief note concerning Hayek’s non-standard conception of knowledge," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 205-210, June.
    3. Elizabeth Hemsley, 2020. "Consent, democracy and the future of liberalism," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 253-270, March.
    4. Viktor J. Vanberg, 2023. "Economics as a life-science: The enduring significance of Carl Menger’s individualist-evolutionary research program," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 145-162, June.
    5. Viktor J. Vanberg, 2022. "Carl Menger, F.A. Hayek and the evolutionary strand in Austrian economics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 481-515, December.
    6. Constantinos Repapis, 2014. "J.M. Keynes, F.A. Hayek and the Common Reader," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-1, September.
    7. Bruce Caldwell, 2020. "The Road to Serfdom after 75 Years," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(3), pages 720-748, September.
    8. Mário Graça Moura, 2017. "Schumpeter and the meanings of rationality," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 115-138, January.
    9. Vanberg, Viktor J., 2021. "Review of “F.A.Hayek and the Epistemology of Politics – The Curious Task of Economics” by Scott Scheall," OSF Preprints gjv7r, Center for Open Science.
    10. Mark Nolan, 2013. "Hayek’s 1945 Finlay Memorial Lecture: Tracing the origins and evolution of his ‘true’ individualism," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 26(1), pages 53-71, March.
    11. Vincent Carret, 2022. "Jacques Rueff, Friedrich Hayek, and the Emergence of Economic Order: the Case of the European Coal and Steel Community," Working Papers halshs-03824688, HAL.
    12. Vanberg, Viktor J., 2016. "Social contract vs. invisible hand: Agreeing to solve social dilemmas," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 16/04, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    13. Virgil Henry Storr & Stefanie Haeffele & Jordan K. Lofthouse & Laura E. Grube, 2021. "Essential or not? Knowledge problems and COVID‐19 stay‐at‐home orders," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 87(4), pages 1229-1249, April.
    14. Richard M. Ebeling, 2014. "Hayek and Mises," Chapters, in: Roger W. Garrison & Norman Barry (ed.), Elgar Companion to Hayekian Economics, chapter 7, pages 138-164, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Anna B. Faria & J. Robert Subrick, 2022. "Brazil’s road to serfdom," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 35(2), pages 143-161, June.
    16. Bruce Caldwell & Leonidas Montes, 2015. "Friedrich Hayek and his visits to Chile," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 261-309, September.
    17. Paul Lewis & Richard E. Wagner, 2017. "New Austrian macro theory: A call for inquiry," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Diogo Lourenço & Mário Graça Moura, 2016. "The Economic Problem of a Community: ontological reflections inspired by the Socialist Calculation Debate," FEP Working Papers 572, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    19. Paul Lewis, 2005. "Structure, agency and causality in post-revival Austrian economics: tensions and resolutions," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 291-316.
    20. Richard Adelstein, 2021. "Economics not engineering," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 48(4), pages 573-579, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Hayek; Scientism; The Sensory Order; Attitudes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:por:fepwps:560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fepuppt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.