Author
Abstract
The standard bank reserve model is extended by explicitly introducing the dimension of time. This feature has not been addressed in the literature which seem to be a very surprising omission given that that the concensus view of this financial institution is that of a (differentiated) microeconomic firm maximizing over terminal wealth. The results indicate that the solution across periods is stationary. All the information needed by the bank to make its choice is embodied in the various interest rates as well as in the penalty structure that institutionally defines the cost of illiquidity. Neither the contemporaneous level of portfolio variables nor its comparative levels in previous periods become relevant to the optimal rule. It is further shown that the stationary solution is in fact Markov stationary, that is, the intraperiod optima will be exactly the same as that in the static case. This literally suggests that the optimization in a multi-period horizon can be taken as a series of repeated one-period models, leading to the same set of optima. This result was shown to be robust, particularly when the allocation problems is modeled explicitly as a Marcov process. The model is extended to account for the possibility of loans with fixed term beyond one planning period. This means that resources for these type of instruments will have to be pre-committed by the bank and therefore would not be free to be allocated over the period in which the multi-period loan is in effect. The results lead to an ambiguity as to whether optimal reserves would either increase or decrease. This was explained in terms of the competing influence of what is labelled as an ?income-commitment effect? and an "income-option effect".
Suggested Citation
Johnny Noe E. Ravalo, 1995.
"An Intertemporal Model of Optimal Commercial Bank Reserves,"
UP School of Economics Discussion Papers
199502, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:phs:dpaper:199502
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:199502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RT Campos (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seupdph.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.