IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phs/dpaper/198305.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic and Social Impact Analysis of Small Industry Promotion

Author

Listed:
  • Ernesto M. Pernia

    (School of Economics, University of the Philippines Diliman)

Abstract

Small-scale industry (SI) promotion became a prominent policy instrument in developing countries during the 70s and will probably maintain such prominence in the 80s. In the Philippines a major SI promotion program was initiated in 1974 by the Ministry of Industry. In this paper, an attempt is made to evaluate the impacts of SI promotion on various economic and social development concerns. The results of the analysis seem to lend credence to the policy of fostering small enterprises. Although some of the popular claims about their contribution to development goals may be overstated, there is an indication that public policy support for small industry development in the regions/provinces is worthwhile because it apparently makes a difference with respect to socioeconomic concerns. Intuitively, the promotion cost seems modest although, as with project benefits, it has to be compared with the costs of other government development projects. On the whole, a method that combines quantitative and qualitative survey data for economic and social impact analysis has something to recommend itself. Needless to say, the ways in which the surveys were designed and conducted for this study leave some rooms for improvement. Given the lessons of experience, such improvement should be gained in a next empirical application of the method suggested in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernesto M. Pernia, 1983. "An Economic and Social Impact Analysis of Small Industry Promotion," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 198305, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:198305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:198305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RT Campos (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seupdph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.