IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/rpseri/rps_2020-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment of the Free Irrigation Service Act

Author

Listed:
  • Briones, Roehlano M.
  • Inocencio, Arlene B.
  • Rola, Agnes C.
  • Clemente, Roberto S.
  • Luyun, Roger Jr. A.

Abstract

This study is a preliminary assessment of the policy change brought by the Free Irrigation Service Act through an examination of secondary data and collection of primary information through key informant interviews and focus group discussions. The study found that free irrigation had the potential to benefit millions of individuals, although it only led to a small savings in palay production cost. Moreover, while palay farmers were poorer than the average household, most of them were not poor. The study urges the government to continue pursuing irrigation management transfer within the context of free irrigation based on minimum maintenance for the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) and transparent maintenance standards for both NIA and irrigators’ associations. It also calls for a sustained and increasing subsidy for operations and maintenance, which must be made available only on a performance basis. The study advocates for the transformation of NIA into a service agency specializing in technical assistance, contract design, and performance monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Briones, Roehlano M. & Inocencio, Arlene B. & Rola, Agnes C. & Clemente, Roberto S. & Luyun, Roger Jr. A., 2020. "Assessment of the Free Irrigation Service Act," Research Paper Series RPS 2020-05, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:rpseri:rps_2020-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/research-paper-series/assessment-of-the-free-irrigation-service-act
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    National irrigation Administration; Free Irrigation Service Act; irrigation system;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:rpseri:rps_2020-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.