IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2024-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Trifocalization on Philippine Education Outcomes and the Coordination Issue

Author

Listed:
  • Orbeta, Aniceto Jr. C.
  • Paqueo, Vicente B.
  • Maddawin, Ricxie B.
  • Abrigo, Michael R.M.
  • Sister, Johanna Marie Astrid A.
  • Sarne, Solomon R.
  • Lavega, Marie Louissie Ynez U.

Abstract

Thirty-two years ago, the First Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM I) established a trifocalized Philippine Educational and Training System (PETS) to ramp up the achievement of the country’s educational and training goals. EDCOM I aimed to raise the system’s performance by transforming the PETS from a centralized Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS) into a system comprising three separate national education agencies, each vested with the responsibility and authority to lead on education and training matters. These agencies are the Department for Basic Education (DepEd), the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), and the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA). Despite well-intentioned reform efforts advocated by EDCOM I, the PETS is not performing as well as education and development leaders had hoped. This state of affairs has led some influential leaders and advisers of EDCOM II to call for a reversal or modification of the current trifocalized PETS. This study seeks to address the aforementioned concerns and to analyze the proposal to reverse or modify trifocalization. To this end, the analysis aims to determine the impact of trifocalization on desired education and skills development outcomes in the Philippines using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. This study finds that trifocalization has had no statistically significant impact on education outcomes at conventional confidence levels. The empirical results are consistent with findings from key informant interviews. Furthermore, the study discusses why a trifocalized PETS might not work as expected. Given its findings, the report offers several reform ideas that EDCOM II may want to consider to enable and incentivize the trifocalized system to function more effectively, especially regarding coordination and other issues that key informants regard as fundamental. One recommendation is the establishment of an independent agency with oversight responsibilities and powers to hold DepEd, CHED, and TESDA and other related agencies accountable for their performance in the PETS. Comments on this paper are welcome within 60 days from the date of posting. Email publications@pids.gov.ph.

Suggested Citation

  • Orbeta, Aniceto Jr. C. & Paqueo, Vicente B. & Maddawin, Ricxie B. & Abrigo, Michael R.M. & Sister, Johanna Marie Astrid A. & Sarne, Solomon R. & Lavega, Marie Louissie Ynez U., 2024. "The Impact of Trifocalization on Philippine Education Outcomes and the Coordination Issue," Discussion Papers DP 2024-15, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2024-15
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2024.15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/the-impact-of-trifocalization-on-philippine-education-outcomes-and-the-coordination-issue
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2024.15?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2024-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.