IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2014-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of the Cheaper Medicines Act on Households in Metro Manila: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • De Guzman, Eleanora
  • Fausto, Maria Adoracion

Abstract

This research forms part of the "Health Systems Research Management in the Department of Health (DOH)", a project funded by the DOH and implemented by the Philippine Institute for Development Studies. The study aimed to: determine knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to the Cheaper Medicines Act (CMA) among households from three socioeconomic classes (SECs) - low income (Class DE), middle income (Class C), and high income (Class AB); and assess the impact of the key provisions and implementation of the CMA among these three classes of households. Information from this study would provide insights useful in identifying actions to improve the implementation of the CMA and increase its positive impact on the poorer sections of society.The main research methodology was focus group discussion (FGD) complemented by a review of related literature. A total of 62 respondents (Rs), all female, were selected from the three SECs based on the Philippine Marketing and Opinion Research Society (MORES) classification and on their being household (HH) decisionmakers on health matters. Nine FGDs were conducted in June 2013 - three from each SEC. All Rs were from Metro Manila since it is the biggest market for any product or service in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • De Guzman, Eleanora & Fausto, Maria Adoracion, 2014. "The Impact of the Cheaper Medicines Act on Households in Metro Manila: A Qualitative Study," Discussion Papers DP 2014-20, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2014-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/the-impact-of-the-cheaper-medicines-act-on-households-in-metro-manila-a-qualitative-study
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shehla Zaidi & Maryam Bigdeli & Noureen Aleem & Arash Rashidian, 2013. "Access to Essential Medicines in Pakistan: Policy and Health Systems Research Concerns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amna Saeed & Hamid Saeed & Zikria Saleem & Yu Fang & Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar, 2019. "Evaluation of prices, availability and affordability of essential medicines in Lahore Division, Pakistan: A cross-sectional survey using WHO/HAI methodology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Muhammad Atif & Iram Malik, 2020. "Why is Pakistan vulnerable to COVID‐19 associated morbidity and mortality? A scoping review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 1041-1054, September.
    3. Mehmood, Shahid, 2022. "Regulating the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP)," MPRA Paper 113416, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Ayeesha Kamran Kamal & Wardah Khalid & Abdul Muqeet & Anum Jamil & Kashfa Farhat & Sehar Rahim Ali Gillani & Maryam Zulfiqar & Mehreen Saif & Aliya Amin Muhammad & Fabiha Zaidi & Mohammad Mustafa & Am, 2018. "Making prescriptions “talk” to stroke and heart attack survivors to improve adherence: Results of a randomized clinical trial (The Talking Rx Study)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2014-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.