IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phd/dpaper/dp_2013-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Reforestation Program of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Israel, Danilo C.
  • Lintag, Jeffrey H.

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to determine if the reforestation program of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) over the years has been successful in attaining its stated objectives and in mitigating the adverse impacts of climate change on forest resources and the natural environment. The corollary goal was to develop recommendations to improve reforestation activities in light of the National Greening Program (NGP) of the current administration. The study used secondary data generated from institutional sources and primary data gathered through key informant interviews and focus group discussions conducted in some selected NGP sites in the Caraga region in Mindanao.In summary, the study found the following: a) At the national level, the reforestation program of the DENR has only partially attained its replanting targets; b) Also at the national level, it appears to have become relatively inefficient in the conduct of replanting activities over the years; and c) At the individual site level, it may have been effective to some degree in increasing incomes and livelihood opportunities, improving the natural resource and environmental situation, and achieving the other objectives of reforestation in many areas. Based on the findings, some recommendations for improvements particularly related to the implementation of the NGP were put forward by the study. In conclusion, the study asserts that other than the infusion of sufficient financial and manpower resources, a reforestation program would have a better chance of attaining its objectives if its implementers can sufficiently monitor activities and effectively implement changes in operations to address the problems encountered.

Suggested Citation

  • Israel, Danilo C. & Lintag, Jeffrey H., 2013. "Assessment of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Reforestation Program of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources," Discussion Papers DP 2013-22, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2013-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pids.gov.ph/publication/discussion-papers/assessment-of-the-efficiency-and-effectiveness-of-the-reforestation-program-of-the-department-of-environment-and-natural-resources
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Israel, Danilo C., 2015. "Nongovernment Reforestation in the Philippines: Review, Analysis, and Ways Forward," Research Paper Series DP 2015-49, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    2. Altenburg, Tilman & Fischer, Cecilia & Huck, Kerstin & Kruip, Anna & Müller, Sören & Sörensen, Stefanie, 2017. "Managing coastal ecosystems in the Philippines: what Cash for Work programmes can contribute," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 94, number 94, July.
    3. Ancog, Rico C. & Florece, Leonardo M. & Nicopior, Ozzy Boy, 2016. "Fire occurrence and fire mitigation strategies in a grassland reforestation area in the Philippines," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 35-45.
    4. Israel, Danilo C., 2015. "Nongovernment Reforestation in the Philippines: Review, Analysis, and Ways Forward," Discussion Papers DP 2015-49, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Philippines; zero-based budgeting; Department of Environment and Natural Resources; National Greening Program; Caraga Region; reforestation; reforestation programs; reforestation laws;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phd:dpaper:dp_2013-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aniceto Orbeta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pidgvph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.