IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pen/papers/24-032.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Behavioral Foundations of Model Misspecification

Author

Listed:
  • J. Aislinn Bohren

    (University of Pennsylvania)

  • Daniel N. Hauser

    (Aalto University)

Abstract

We link two approaches to biased belief formation: non-Bayesian updating and misspecified models. The former parameterizes a bias with an updating rule mapping signals to posterior beliefs or a belief forecast describing anticipated beliefs; the latter is an incorrect model of the signal generating process. Our main result derives necessary and sufficient conditions for an updating rule and belief forecast to have a misspecified model representation, shows that these two components uniquely pin down a representation, and constructs it. This clarifies the belief restrictions implicit in the misspecified model approach. It also allows leveraging of the distinct advantages of each approach by decomposing a model into empirically identifiable components, showing these components isolate the two forms of bias that the model encodes—the retrospective bias after information arrives and the prospective bias beforehand, and rendering off-the-shelf tools to characterize asymptotic learning and equilibrium predictions in misspecified models applicable to non-Bayesian updating.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Aislinn Bohren & Daniel N. Hauser, 2024. "Behavioral Foundations of Model Misspecification," PIER Working Paper Archive 24-032, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Handle: RePEc:pen:papers:24-032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.sas.upenn.edu/system/files/working-papers/24-032%20PIER%20Paper%20Submission.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Model misspecification; belief formation; learning; non-Bayesian updating; heuristics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pen:papers:24-032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deupaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.