Author
Abstract
Overconfidence has been extensively documented in psychology and economics. This paper studies the long-term interaction between two overcon?dent agents who learn about common payo?-relevant fundamentals, such as the quality of a joint project or their working environment, and choose how much e?ort to exert. Overcon?dence causes agents to underestimate the fundamental to justify their worse-than-expected performance. We show that in many settings, agents create informational externalities for each other. When informational externalities are positive, the agents’ learning processes are mutually-reinforcing: when one agent best responds to his own over-con?dence, the other agent underestimates the fundamental more severely and takes an more extreme action, generating a positive feedback loop. The opposite pattern, mutually-limiting learning, arises when informational externalities are negative. Additionally, overcon?dence can lead to Pareto improvement in welfare as it corrects the ine?ciencies that arise in public good provision problems. This contrasts with the analogous single-agent environment, in which there is no scope for informational externalities and overcon?dence can only decrease welfare. Finally, we prove that under certain conditions, agents’ beliefs and e?ort choices converge to a steady state that is a Berk-Nash equilibrium.
Suggested Citation
Cuimin Ba & Alice Gindin, 2021.
"A Multi-Agent Model of Misspeci?ed Learning with Overcon?dence,"
PIER Working Paper Archive
21-019, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
Handle:
RePEc:pen:papers:21-019
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pen:papers:21-019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrator (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deupaus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.