IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pcp/pucwps/wp00290.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Crecimiento económico: enfoques y modelos. Capítulo 3 - La controversia sobre la teoría del capital y la teoría del crecimiento

Author

Listed:
  • Félix Jiménez

    (Departamento de Economía- Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)

Abstract

This chapter contains the capital theory controversy that took place among the most important economists from the universities of Cambridge (UK) and Cambridge (Mass.). First, we present the neoclassical propositions which are summarized in the neoclassical parables. The second section contains Robinson’s criticism to the neoclassical capital theory and Garegnani’s criticism to the decreasing marginal productivity theory. Third, we summarize the Samuelson attempt of validating the neoclassical production function and his main mistakes. The fourth section presents the Solow response and Nell’s criticism. Finally, we present the main contributions of the capital theory controversy.

Suggested Citation

  • Félix Jiménez, 2010. "Crecimiento económico: enfoques y modelos. Capítulo 3 - La controversia sobre la teoría del capital y la teoría del crecimiento," Documentos de Trabajo / Working Papers 2010-290, Departamento de Economía - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
  • Handle: RePEc:pcp:pucwps:wp00290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://files.pucp.edu.pe/departamento/economia/DDD290.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    teoría política; labor del mercado.;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcp:pucwps:wp00290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/depucpe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.