IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oxf/wpaper/558.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are "Gangstas" Peacocks? The Handicap Principle and Illicit Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Mell

Abstract

Criminals who wear gang colors are acting in a surprisingly brazen way which must increase the probability of being caught and punished by the police. In our model this brazen behavior is a solution to an enforcement problem. The central idea is that less able criminals see lower gains from continued participation in crime because they will be caught and punished more often. Lower future gains imply that reputational concerns will be less effective at enforcing honesty. Only dealing with brazen criminals will become a good way to avoid dealing with incompetent criminals, because they cannot afford to mimic the brazen behavior. The principle is similar to the selection for a handicap in evolutionary biology.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Mell, 2011. "Are "Gangstas" Peacocks? The Handicap Principle and Illicit Markets," Economics Series Working Papers 558, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8c35e991-77b2-443b-bcbf-178d6cd3fd70
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Blog mentions

    As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
    1. An Economic Analysis of Gang Colors
      by Christopher Shea in Ideas Market on 2011-08-02 22:09:22
    2. The Economics of Gang Colors
      by Josh Wright in Truth on the Market on 2011-08-04 07:31:21

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Illegal behaviour and the enforcement of law; Information; Uncertainty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Pouliquen The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Anne Pouliquen to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfeixuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.