IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oxf/wpaper/2008fe14.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stock Market Liquidity and Firm Performance: Wall Street Rule or Wall Street Rules?

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian W. Fang
  • Thomas H. Noe
  • Sheri Tice

Abstract

This paper investigates the relation between stock liquidity and firm performance. We find that firms with liquid stocks have better firm performance as measured by the market-to-book ratio. This result holds even when we include industry or firm fixed effects, control for idiosyncratic risk, control for endogenous liquidity with instrumental variables, or use alternative measures of liquidity. To identify the causal effect of liquidity on firm performance, we study an exogenous shock to liquidity - the decimilization of stock trading - and document that the increase in liquidity around decimalization improved firm performance. We next investigate the causes of liquidity's beneficial effect and find support for liquidity enhancing performance by increasing the information content of market prices, and strengthening the incentive effects of performance based compensation contracts. We find no evidence that liquidity enhances blockholder intervention. Finally, momentum trading, analyst coverage, investor overreaction and liquidity's valuation effects do not appear to drive our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian W. Fang & Thomas H. Noe & Sheri Tice, 2008. "Stock Market Liquidity and Firm Performance: Wall Street Rule or Wall Street Rules?," Economics Series Working Papers 2008fe14, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:2008fe14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Adeolu Abata & Stephen Oseko Migiro, 2016. "Does Liquidity Management Affect Profitability in Selected Nigerian-Quoted Manufacturing Firms?," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(4), pages 41-51.
    2. Jonathan Batten & Xuan Vinh Vo, 2019. "Liquidity And Firm Value In An Emerging Market," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(02), pages 365-376, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:2008fe14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Pouliquen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfeixuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.