Author
Listed:
- Simmons, Claire N
(Duke University)
Abstract
Americans idealize personal freedom. Every citizen recognizes the cries for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness demanding individual choice be upheld in the United States. Our ideals are ingrained in our culture and manifest in our national documents, governances, and traditions. Our healthcare system is no exception. For years, medical schools have taught bioethics courses to student physicians. Schools design courses to train providers in biomedical ethics. Despite developing more patient centered treatments, mental health care -- a major component of health care -- lags behind in socially just care. Throughout my thesis I will discuss the discrepancy between somatic health care and mental health care, as well as the risks of compromising basic personal autonomy. In order for physicians to provide socially just health care, they must respect the principle of autonomy and abstain from treating a patient against their will. For the purposes of this paper, I am not writing an anti- nor a pro-suicide position. I do not suggest we stand idly by while watching someone gravely injure themselves or suffocate within their pain. What I am saying is that suicidal ideation is not mitigated by confinement and social isolation. Even if you believe suicide is wrong, overreacting to suicidal ideation is an ineffective and potentially harmful way to combat suicide. In this paper, I am questioning the policies of involuntary-psychiatric hospitalization.
Suggested Citation
Simmons, Claire N, 2019.
"Socially Just Health Care in Mental Health Policy,"
Thesis Commons
a5rkw_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:thesis:a5rkw_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/a5rkw_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:a5rkw_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thesiscommons.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.