Author
Abstract
When faced with a choice between two monetary lotteries, people make different decisions depending on whether they rely on their personal experience or upon described information. In the study of risky decision making, this discrepancy has been the called description-experience gap. While this phenomenon is well-established, there is still ongoing academic debate about the underlying causes of the effect. Using the drift-diffusion model, we investigate how components of decision making change when participants receive feedback about the outcomes to their choices. Our findings show that the description-experience gap is associated with shifts in drift rate and boundary separation, suggesting that individuals adjust their evaluation methods and response caution after experiencing outcomes. Notably, we found no evidence that shifts in starting point contribute to the description-experience gap, indicating that pre-evaluation biases do not play a role. Additionally, our analysis introduces three subcategories to the description-experience gap that distinguish between how existing choice preferences change due to feedback. Our results suggest that different dynamics might be at play depending on whether an existing preference increases or weakens. We find that in decision problems where an existing preference intensifies, the drift rate is, in about half of the cases, the sole parameter facilitating the description-experience gap. In contrast, in decision problems where an existing preference weakens, boundary separation is, also in about half of the cases, the only parameter causing the gap.
Suggested Citation
van der Meer, Jeroen, 2025.
"What Causes The Description-Experience Gap? A Drift-Diffusion Model Analysis,"
Thesis Commons
6snfj_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:thesis:6snfj_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6snfj_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:6snfj_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thesiscommons.org .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.