IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/thesis/27ayk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

If the Bees Think: Exploring Animal Consciousness and the Quest for Natural Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Chen

Abstract

This article explores the complex subject of animal consciousness and the philosophical and ethical implications of extending natural rights to non-human species. Assuming that various animals exhibit forms of consciousness, this work explores the cognitive abilities and emotional experiences of primates, cetaceans, birds, mammals, and notably, bees, whose sophisticated behaviors suggest a higher cognitive capacity than traditionally acknowledged. The discourse extends into the moral considerations these cognitive capacities necessitate, discussing the philosophical underpinnings and the practical implications of acknowledging such consciousness in legal and societal contexts. By examining the relationship between consciousness and moral status, the article advocates for a redefined ethical framework that includes natural rights for animals, emphasizing the right to life, liberty, and dignity. The potential benefits of recognizing these rights are analyzed not only from an ethical standpoint but also in terms of broader environmental and societal health. This work calls for a shift beyond anthropocentric views towards a more inclusive, compassionate approach that recognizes the intrinsic value and rights of all conscious beings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Chen, 2024. "If the Bees Think: Exploring Animal Consciousness and the Quest for Natural Rights," Thesis Commons 27ayk, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:27ayk
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/27ayk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66431c114664da83f1ed6b03/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/27ayk?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:thesis:27ayk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thesiscommons.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.