IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/z7usq.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is resisting Covid-19 vaccination a “problem”? A critical policy inquiry of vaccine mandates for healthcare workers

Author

Listed:
  • Chaufan, Claudia

    (York University)

  • Hemsing, Natalie

Abstract

As the COVID-19 global vaccination campaign was launched in December of 2020, vaccination became mandatory for many healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide. Large minorities resisted the policy, and the responses of authorities to this resistance led to damaged professional reputations, job losses, and suspension or termination of practice licenses. The joint effect of dismissals, early retirements, career changes, and vaccine injuries disabling some compliant HCWs from adequate performance, has exacerbated existing crises within health systems. Nevertheless, the position of leading health authorities has been that the benefits of a fully vaccinated healthcare labour force - protecting health systems, vulnerable patient populations, and even HCWs themselves – achieved through mandates, if necessary, outweigh its potential harms. Informed by critical policy and discourse traditions, we examine the expert literature on vaccine mandates for HCWs. We find that this literature neglects evidence countering claims about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines, dismisses the science supporting the contextual nature of microbial virulence, miscalculates patient and system-level harms of vaccination policies, and ignores or legitimizes the coercive elements built into their design. We discuss the implications of our findings for the sustainability of health systems, for patient care, and for the well-being of HCWs, and suggest directions for ethical clinical and policy practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaufan, Claudia & Hemsing, Natalie, 2024. "Is resisting Covid-19 vaccination a “problem”? A critical policy inquiry of vaccine mandates for healthcare workers," SocArXiv z7usq, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:z7usq
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/z7usq
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65e479fd4dfd8c007e27f472/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/z7usq?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wirpsa, M.J. & Galchutt, P. & Price, C.S. & Schaefer, B. & Szilagyi, C. & Palmer, P.K., 2023. "Mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for healthcare workers: The experience of chaplains evaluating religious accommodation requests from coworkers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    2. Zubairu Iliyasu & Rayyan M. Garba & Mansur A. Aliyu & Auwalu U. Gajida & Taiwo G. Amole & Amina A. Umar & Hadiza M. Abdullahi & Fatimah I. Tsiga-Ahmed & Aminatu A. Kwaku & Meira S. Kowalski & Hamisu M, 2022. "“I Would Rather Take the Vaccine Than Undergo Weekly Testing” : Correlates of Health Workers’ Support for COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:z7usq. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.