IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/yq57a_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Artificial Intelligence and Public Values: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Legore, Divali
  • Webster, Christine

Abstract

In recent years, there has been both growing public debate and increased scholarship and policy dialogue on public and societal concerns associated with the rise of AI and its applications. This paper presents the results and insights gained from a systematic literature review on the societal dimensions of AI invention and innovation, focusing on the public values expressed in AI patent documents. We build on public value frameworks to conceptualize public values expressed in patents as statements regarding the potential social objectives and benefits of an invention, beyond the private value to patent holders. Although the United States Patent and Trademarking Office (USPTO) has no formal requirements for expressions of public values in patent documents, patent applications often describe the broader objectives or problems that the invention aims to address. Such public value statements inform the context for understanding the potential utility of a patent.

Suggested Citation

  • Legore, Divali & Webster, Christine, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Public Values: A Literature Review," SocArXiv yq57a_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:yq57a_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/yq57a_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63dc29411e96860382b2525b/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/yq57a_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ribeiro, Barbara & Shapira, Philip, 2020. "Private and public values of innovation: A patent analysis of synthetic biology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashty S. Karim & Dylan M. Brown & Chloé M. Archuleta & Sharisse Grannan & Ludmilla Aristilde & Yogesh Goyal & Josh N. Leonard & Niall M. Mangan & Arthur Prindle & Gabriel J. Rocklin & Keith J. Tyo & L, 2024. "Deconstructing synthetic biology across scales: a conceptual approach for training synthetic biologists," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Nie, Pu-yan & Chen, Zi-rui & Wang, Chan, 2021. "Intellectual property pricing under asymmetric duopoly," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Carolina Castaldi & Sandro Mendonca, 2021. "Regions and trademarks. Research opportunities and policy insights from leveraging trademarks in regional innovation studies," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2138, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2021.
    4. Alejandro Martínez & Juan Carlos Henao & Mario A. Pinzón Camargo, 2021. "Disrupción tecnológica, transformación digital y sociedad. Tomo I, ¿Cuarta revolución industrial? : contribuciones tecnosociales para la transformación social," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1280, August.
    5. Podrecca, Matteo & Culot, Giovanna & Tavassoli, Sam & Orzes, Guido, 2024. "Artificial intelligence for climate change: a patent analysis in the manufacturing sector," Papers in Innovation Studies 2024/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    6. Meyer, Camille & Naicker, Kiruben, 2023. "Collective intellectual property of Indigenous peoples and local communities: Exploring power asymmetries in the rooibos geographical indication and industry-wide benefit-sharing agreement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    7. Ribeiro, Barbara & Meckin, Robert & Balmer, Andrew & Shapira, Philip, 2023. "The digitalisation paradox of everyday scientific labour: How mundane knowledge work is amplified and diversified in the biosciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    8. Fiori, Giovana Maria Lanchoti & Basso, Fernanda Gisele & Porto, Geciane Silveira, 2022. "Cooperation in R&D in the pharmaceutical industry: Technological and clinical trial networks in oncology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Gnekpe, Christian & Jimenez, Alfredo, 2023. "Smoke signal: When firms' patent strategy and local patent protection system affect equity stakes in cross-border acquisitions," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    10. Baaden, Philipp & Rennings, Michael & John, Marcus & Bröring, Stefanie, 2024. "On the emergence of interdisciplinary scientific fields: (how) does it relate to science convergence?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    11. Metzger, Philipp & Mendonça, Sandro & Silva, José A. & Damásio, Bruno, 2023. "Battery innovation and the Circular Economy: What are patents revealing?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 516-532.
    12. Zhenyu Zhang & Ke Zhu & Jiaxuan Qu, 2024. "Intellectual Property Rights and Patented Knowledge: Implications for Financing Leases in the Clean Energy Sector of China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12472-12502, September.
    13. Nylund, Petra A. & Ferràs-Hernández, Xavier & Pareras, Luis & Brem, Alexander, 2022. "The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems based on enabling technologies: Evidence from synthetic biology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 728-735.
    14. Gelsomina Catalano & Gaston García López & Alejandro Sánchez & Silvia Vignetti, 2021. "From scientific experiments to innovation: Impact pathways of a Synchrotron Light Facility," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(3), pages 447-472, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:yq57a_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.