IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/xf32m_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Revised findings for "Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers"

Author

Listed:
  • Wood, George
  • Tyler, Tom

Abstract

Wood et al. (2020) studied the rollout of a procedural justice training program in the Chicago Police Department and found large and statistically significant impacts on complaints and sustained complaints against police officers and police use of force. This document describes a subtle statistical problem that led the magnitude of those estimates to be inflated. We then re-analyze the data using a methodology that corrects for this problem. The re-analysis provides less strong conclusions about the effectiveness of the training than the original study: although the point estimates for most outcomes and specifications are negative and of a meaningful magnitude, the confidence intervals typically include zero or very small effects. On the whole, we interpret the data as providing suggestive evidence that procedural justice training reduced the use of force, but no statistically significant evidence for a reduction in complaints or sustained complaints.

Suggested Citation

  • Wood, George & Tyler, Tom, 2021. "Revised findings for "Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers"," SocArXiv xf32m_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:xf32m_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/xf32m_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/60099bc8e80d370a04a5b898/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/xf32m_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:xf32m_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.