IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/x5dtf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Accountability System: Empirical Assessment of Public Sector of Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Said, Jamaliah
  • Alam, Md. Mahmudul

    (Universiti Utara Malaysia)

  • bin Abd Aziz, Mohamad Azizal

Abstract

As the recent Auditor General‟s report discovered some corruptions, weakness, and lack of control in asset management in the public sector of Malaysia, this study is an attempt to assess the status of current practices of accountability in public sector of Malaysia. This study collected primary data based on a set of questionnaire survey that was distributed by email using the Google Doc application among the head of department of 682 departments and agencies under 24 federal ministries including the Prime Minister Department in Malaysia. Finally, based on the email responses, the final sample of the study is 109 respondents. The data were collected based on the opinion about ten factors of accountability practices in the department or agency by using seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The data are analysed under descriptive statistics and factor analysis. Further, the reliability of the data is tested by using Cronbach alpha test, and the validity of data is tested by checking the normality of data through Shapiro Wilk test and graphically. Overall, 87.3% of the respondents mentioned that overall they practice accountability in their department. However, the priority of these ten factors of accountability differs among the services schemes. The accountability in the administrative & diplomatic, education, and medical & health is below the overall average accountability. The accountability in the financial and information system schemes is also not strong enough. Therefore the public sector in Malaysia needs to be transformed into becoming a reliable and efficient sector by ensuring proper accountability and its proper assessment system.

Suggested Citation

  • Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & bin Abd Aziz, Mohamad Azizal, 2019. "Public Accountability System: Empirical Assessment of Public Sector of Malaysia," SocArXiv x5dtf, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:x5dtf
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/x5dtf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5c7757d28d5d98001a3dd272/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/x5dtf?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nava Subramaniam & Jenny Stewart & Chew Ng & Art Shulman, 2013. "Understanding corporate governance in the Australian public sector," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(6), pages 946-977, August.
    2. Per Lægreid & Koen Verhoest & Werner Jann, 2008. "The Governance, Autonomy and Coordination of Public Sector Organizations," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 93-96, June.
    3. Mary Kaldor, 2003. "Civil Society and Accountability," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 5-27.
    4. Shaoul, Jean & Stafford, Anne & Stapleton, Pamela, 2012. "Accountability and corporate governance of public private partnerships," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 213-229.
    5. Mark Christensen & Peter Skærbæk, 2007. "Framing and overflowing of public sector accountability innovations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 101-132, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Mahmudul Alam & Jamaliah Said & Mohamad Azizal Abd Aziz, 2018. "Role of integrity system, internal control system and leadership practices on the accountability practices in the public sectors of Malaysia," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(7), pages 955-976, December.
    2. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Johari, Razana Juhaida, 2019. "Assessment of Accountability Practices in the Public Sector of Malaysia," SocArXiv 5djfu, Center for Open Science.
    3. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & bin Abd Aziz, Mohamad Azizal, 2019. "Public Accountability System: Empirical Assessment of Public Sector of Malaysia," SocArXiv x5dtf_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Johari, Razana Juhaida, 2019. "Assessment of Accountability Practices in the Public Sector of Malaysia," SocArXiv 5djfu_v1, Center for Open Science.
    5. Bergh, Andreas & Erlingsson, Gissur & Gustafsson, Anders & Wittberg, Emanuel, 2018. "Municipally owned enterprises: Nested principal-agent relations and conditions for accountability," Ratio Working Papers 306, The Ratio Institute, revised 18 Oct 2018.
    6. Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Said, Jamaliah & bin Abd Aziz, Mohamad Azizal, 2019. "Role of Integrity System, Internal Control System, and Leadership Practices on the Accountability Practices in the Public Sectors of Malaysia," SocArXiv 94d8v_v1, Center for Open Science.
    7. Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Mirosław Jan Skibniewski & Jiule Song & Hao Lu, 2018. "Analysis of Private Investors Conduct Strategies by Governments Supervising Public-Private Partnership Projects in the New Media Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Razana Juhaida Johari & Md. Mahmudul Alam & Jamaliah Said, 2020. "Empirical assessment on factors contributing to integrity practices of Malaysian public sector officers," Post-Print hal-03538155, HAL.
    9. Huguette Blanco & John Lennard & Sylvain Lamontagne, 2011. "Annual Reporting and Accountability by Municipalities in Canada: An Empirical Investigation," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 195-224, September.
    10. Alejandro Ortega & Maria de los Angeles Baeza & Jose Manuel Vassallo, 2016. "Contractual PPPs for Transport Infrastructure in Spain: Lessons from the Economic Recession," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 187-206, March.
    11. Peda, Peeter & Vinnari, Eija, 2020. "The discursive legitimation of profit in public-private service delivery," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Peter O’Brien & Andy Pike, 2019. "‘Deal or no deal?’ Governing urban infrastructure funding and financing in the UK City Deals," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1448-1476, May.
    13. Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2024. "Navigating the Nexus: Overcoming Challenges in Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Building Initiatives in Developing Countries," MPRA Paper 122667, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Nov 2024.
    14. Monica Reig & Mila Gasco-Hernandez & Marc Esteve, 2021. "Internal and External Transparency in Public-Private Partnerships—The Case of Barcelona’s Water Provision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Daniel Arenas & Pablo Sanchez & Matthew Murphy, 2013. "Different Paths to Collaboration Between Businesses and Civil Society and the Role of Third Parties," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(4), pages 723-739, July.
    16. Said, Jamaliah & bin Abd Aziz1, Mohamad Azizal & Alam, Md. Mahmudul, 2019. "Assessment of the Practices of Internal Control System in the Public Sectors of Malaysia," SocArXiv y4zfa_v1, Center for Open Science.
    17. Rozenfeld, Gabriela Cecylia & Scapens, Robert William, 2021. "Forming mixed-type inter-organisational relationships in Sub-Saharan Africa: The role of institutional logics, social identities and institutionally embedded agency," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    18. Cuthbert, J.R. & Cuthbert, M., 2012. "Why IRR is an inadequate indicator of costs and returns in relation to PFI schemes," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 420-433.
    19. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Khalid, Maizatul Akmar, 2015. "Relationship between good governance and integrity system: Empirical study on the public sector of Malaysia," SocArXiv hdcf7, Center for Open Science.
    20. Ruhaya Atan & Md. Mahmudul Alam & Jamaliah Said, 2017. "Practices of corporate integrity and accountability of non-profit organizations in Malaysia," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 44(12), pages 2271-2286, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:x5dtf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.