IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/w5b37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nuclear Policy Re(V)iew from the Periscope: SLBM and SLCM Policy Options for the 2022 Biden White House

Author

Listed:
  • McKinley, Carla
  • Tannous, Speero M.
  • Hecla, Jake
  • Berliner, Aaron
  • Livingston, Morgan
  • Eng, Arnold
  • Gutterman, Jacob
  • Kennedy, Alexandra
  • Rose, Gregory
  • Senjaya, Stefanie

Abstract

Advances in nuclear weapon technologies from – and the corresponding evolution in the threat landscape posed by – non-allied nations over the past four years underscores the exigency of the United States (U.S) in updating its stated national security policies. Here we review and suggest options for the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) regarding the low-yield submarine-launched cruise missile (SLCM-N) and submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) programs. The 2018 NPR called for programmatic changes to counteract the evolving threat environment and allow for greater deterrence flexibility. These programs include modernization of existing technologies and creation of novel weapons systems. Of these changes, two new programs were started to develop low-yield, sea-based, non-strategic weapons. These options are designed to counter any perceived gaps in U.S. regional deterrence capabilities. We enumerate several policy options likely to be considered by the Biden White House. Our proposed solution calls for maintenance of the W76-2 program and the continuance of the low-yield SLCM-N program; we present our argument along the axes of technical and cost considerations, service system preferences, tailored response capabilities, ensured support and defense of our allies, and prevention of escalation to war.

Suggested Citation

  • McKinley, Carla & Tannous, Speero M. & Hecla, Jake & Berliner, Aaron & Livingston, Morgan & Eng, Arnold & Gutterman, Jacob & Kennedy, Alexandra & Rose, Gregory & Senjaya, Stefanie, 2022. "Nuclear Policy Re(V)iew from the Periscope: SLBM and SLCM Policy Options for the 2022 Biden White House," SocArXiv w5b37, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:w5b37
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/w5b37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/61e24841bc925b034bd4b2ab/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/w5b37?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Congressional Budget Office, 2021. "Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2021 to 2030," Reports 57130, Congressional Budget Office.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:w5b37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.