IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/rjyzg.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Advancing Instrument Validation in Social Sciences: An AI-Powered Chatbot and Interactive Website based on a Research Instrument Validation Framework (RIVF)

Author

Listed:
  • Villarino, Resti Tito

    (Cebu Technological University)

  • Villarino, Maureen Lorence

Abstract

Background: In social sciences, an appreciable degree of instrument validation is intended to maintain scientific rigor and research quality. Objectives: To develop and evaluate an AI chatbot and website for instrument validation, assess their impact on instrument validity improvement, and analyze user perceptions. Methods: Adopting a quantitative design, the study was anchored on the developed RIVF of Villarino (2024). Moreover, it was evaluated through users' perceptions (n=100) by administering an online survey, whereby the employment of pairing t-tests used contrasting instrument validity-pre-vs post-RIVF scores, and one-way ANOVA was used to determine if a relationship existed between users' perceptions and total improvement in validity. A G*Power analysis showed that there was enough statistical power for the analyses: for paired t-tests, it was 99.73% (n = 100, dz = 0.5, α = 0.05), and for one-way ANOVA, 80.95% (n = 100, f = 0.25, α=0.05, four groups). All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 26. Results: Post-RIVF use, all the validity domains showed significant improvements (p-value greater than 0.001), but the maximum significant gain was seen in construct validity [Mean difference=1.20±0.60, t(49)=14.14]. Subjects perceived the AI chatbot as more useful [4.30±0.70 vs. 3.80±0.80, p-value greater than 0.001]. Conclusion: This AI-powered ecosystem indicates a potential for increasing the validity of research instruments in RIVF, while an AI chatbot is efficient in incrementing the construct validity. These results would infer that the use of AI technologies along with traditional validation methods will improve the quality of research instruments in the social sciences. Keywords: artificial intelligence (AI), instrument validation, research methodology, social sciences

Suggested Citation

  • Villarino, Resti Tito & Villarino, Maureen Lorence, 2024. "Advancing Instrument Validation in Social Sciences: An AI-Powered Chatbot and Interactive Website based on a Research Instrument Validation Framework (RIVF)," SocArXiv rjyzg, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rjyzg
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/rjyzg
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66b4feb656c30fcdf6519913/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/rjyzg?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    artificial intelligence (ai); instrument validation; research methodology; social sciences;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:rjyzg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.