IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/k4ujg.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Energy and transport research towards net zero targets and climate change mitigation. A systematic review of evidence communication for policy makers

Author

Listed:
  • Danopoulos, Evangelos
  • Shah, Aarushi
  • Schneider, Claudia
  • Aston, John

Abstract

Scientific studies often put forward policy recommendations (PRs) to bridge the gap between science and policy making. Climate change is one of the areas that PRs can be useful and have major impact, but only if they are based on scientific findings and are communicated trustworthily. The objective of this systematic review is to appraise the quality of PRs in the areas of green energy and transportation. Four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, GeoRef and GreenFile) were searched from 2019. Studies with an environmental focus in the areas of green energy (wind power and hydrogen energy) and transportation that included PRs for tackling climate change or reaching net zero targets were included. The novel Evidence Communication Rules for Policy (ECR-P) critical appraisal tool was used to assess the individual study quality, specifically targeting PRs. The Collaboration for Environmental Evidence Critical Appraisal Tool (CEECAT) was also used. Findings were synthesized narratively based on ECR-P. Twenty-three studies were included, most focusing on wind power, followed by hydrogen energy and transportation. The majority of studies used econometric and empirical modelling. According to CEECAT, study quality was found to be medium to poor. ECR-P was piloted and validated, the rating results indicated poor quality of PRs across all studies. The areas addressing the papers inherent bias towards advocacy against providing information and to disclose uncertainties were found to present most concerns. Communication quality was markedly better regarding study findings and conclusion than PRs. Researchers must use the same scientific rigour and reporting standards in PRs as in any other section of their studies. A reporting guideline for scientific-based PRs could be of great assistance. More research in other disciplines is needed to validate our results and provide further data.

Suggested Citation

  • Danopoulos, Evangelos & Shah, Aarushi & Schneider, Claudia & Aston, John, 2024. "Energy and transport research towards net zero targets and climate change mitigation. A systematic review of evidence communication for policy makers," SocArXiv k4ujg, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:k4ujg
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/k4ujg
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/668acc8bede75d05346939c9/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/k4ujg?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:k4ujg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.