IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/e6bhk.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is there a religious dimension to concern about farmer-herder conflicts in Nigeria?

Author

Listed:
  • Tuki, Daniel

Abstract

Although many studies have been conducted on the conflicts between Fulani nomadic herders and sedentary farmers over land and water resources in Nigeria, very few have examined the religious dimension of these conflicts. In fact, some studies have described the religious dimension as an oversimplification of a complex social problem. But is this really the case? Is religion important in understanding the dynamics of the conflict? My instrumental variable regression results show that Muslim domination – a scenario where the population in a local government area (LGA) (i.e. municipality) is predominantly Muslim – reduces the likelihood of being concerned about farmer-herder conflicts. It also shows that Muslims are less concerned about the conflict than Christians. A plausible mechanism behind this finding is that the common religion of Islam shared by the nomadic herders and the Muslim sedentary population makes it easier for resource-motivated conflicts to be resolved amicably.

Suggested Citation

  • Tuki, Daniel, 2023. "Is there a religious dimension to concern about farmer-herder conflicts in Nigeria?," SocArXiv e6bhk, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:e6bhk
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/e6bhk
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6441152a384853160b495aaf/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/e6bhk?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuki, Daniel, 2023. "You’re not welcome! Violence and support for a grazing ban policy in Kaduna, Nigeria," SocArXiv 3hec8, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:e6bhk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.