IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/63nxy.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How many in a crowd? Assessing overcrowding measures in Australian housing

Author

Listed:
  • Dockery, Michael
  • Moskos, Megan
  • Isherwood, Linda
  • Harris, Mark

Abstract

This study assess the measurement of crowding in Australia and explores the relationships between various household density measures and the wellbeing of occupants. Indicators of the incidence or severity of household crowding in Australia actually measure occupant density—the ratio of occupants to available space—rather than crowding, which relates to a psychological response to the sense of excessive density. How overcrowding is defined and measured has important implications for funding requirements, the appropriate mix of housing stock given household structures and rules for allocating families to public and community housing. There is a complex relationship between occupant density and wellbeing within and across households. Any measure based only on readily observable metrics of household composition and the number of bedrooms is unlikely to accurately discriminate between households that are overcrowded—in that occupants are suffering significant adverse effects from excessive density—from households that are not overcrowded. While such measures may have some descriptive value, they will not adequately meet informational needs for many policy and practice purposes, including the targeting of assistance. The experiences of people from CALD and Indigenous backgrounds living in overcrowded households were explored in qualitative interviews. The interviews revealed substantial negative effects, including lack of privacy, excessive noise, antisocial behaviour, child safety and wellbeing concerns, increased housework, food theft, and family and financial strain. Service providers are also impacted by having to manage additional repairs and maintenance, provision of intensive tenancy support and the need to reallocate tenants. Some positive effects were noted, including caring for family members, strengthened family ties, promotion of cultural identity, companionship and financial benefits. The realisation of benefits generally relies on the household being well-functioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Dockery, Michael & Moskos, Megan & Isherwood, Linda & Harris, Mark, 2022. "How many in a crowd? Assessing overcrowding measures in Australian housing," SocArXiv 63nxy, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:63nxy
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/63nxy
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/62e8c053a65de601d285e22c/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/63nxy?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziersch, Anna & Due, Clemence, 2018. "A mixed methods systematic review of studies examining the relationship between housing and health for people from refugee and asylum seeking backgrounds," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 199-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kritika Rana & Andrew Page & Jennifer L. Kent & Amit Arora, 2022. "Pathways Linking Housing Inequalities and Health Outcomes among Migrant and Refugee Populations in High-Income Countries: A Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Anna Ziersch & Clemence Due & Moira Walsh, 2023. "Housing in Place: Housing, Neighbourhood and Resettlement for People from Refugee and Asylum Seeker Backgrounds in Australia," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1413-1436, September.
    3. Laura Smith & Ha Hoang & Tamara Reynish & Kim McLeod & Chona Hannah & Stuart Auckland & Shameran Slewa-Younan & Jonathan Mond, 2020. "Factors Shaping the Lived Experience of Resettlement for Former Refugees in Regional Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. McQuaid, Jennifer H. & Mandavia, Amar & Cassidy, Galen & Silva, Michelle Alejandra & Esmail, Kaiz & Aragula, Shreya & Gamez, Gigi & McKenzie, Katherine, 2024. "Persecution as stigma-driven trauma: Social determinants, stigma, and violence in asylum seekers in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:63nxy. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.