IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/4efdt.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating death rates in complex humanitarian emergencies using the network survival method

Author

Listed:
  • Breen, Casey
  • Rahman, Saeed
  • Kay, Christina
  • Smits, Joeri
  • Azar, Abraham
  • Ahuka-Mundeke, Steve
  • Feehan, Dennis

Abstract

Reliable estimates of death rates in complex humanitarian emergencies are critical for assessing the severity of a crisis and for effectively allocating resources. However, in many humanitarian settings, logistical and security concerns make conventional methods for estimating death rates infeasible. We develop and test a new method for estimating death rates in humanitarian emergencies using reports of deaths in survey respondents’ social networks. To test our method, we collected original data in Tanganyika Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a setting where reliable estimates of death rates are in high demand. Qualitative fieldwork suggested testing two different types of personal networks as the basis for death rate estimates: deaths among immediate neighbors and deaths among kin. We benchmarked our network estimates against a standard retrospective household mortality survey, which estimated a crude death rate nearly twice as high as our network-based methods. Given both methods are equally plausible, our findings underscore the need for further validation and development of both methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Breen, Casey & Rahman, Saeed & Kay, Christina & Smits, Joeri & Azar, Abraham & Ahuka-Mundeke, Steve & Feehan, Dennis, 2024. "Estimating death rates in complex humanitarian emergencies using the network survival method," SocArXiv 4efdt, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4efdt
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/4efdt
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6718e1781c36467cf5bfa6a6/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/4efdt?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4efdt. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.