IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/x53hj.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Race Lévy flights: A mathematically tractable framework for studying heavy-tailed accumulation noise

Author

Listed:
  • Hadian Rasanan, Amir Hosein
  • Evans, Nathan J.
  • Padash, Amin
  • Rad, Jamal Amani

Abstract

Lévy flights is a particular exemplar of the generalised random walk processes, in which the jump lengths are drawn from a power-law asymptote ($\alpha$-stable) distribution. While employing this heavy-tailed distribution for accumulation noise within the diffusion decision model framework provides improved fitting performance over the standard Gaussian accumulation noise, the Lévy flight model contains two key limitations. Specifically, the use of the diffusion framework limits the model to only being applicable to two alternative decision-making tasks, and the lack of an exact likelihood function can make fitting behavioral data a challenging and computationally costly task. This paper aims to provide a mathematically tractable framework for modeling $n$-alternative ($n\geq1$) decision-making tasks with an $\alpha$-stable distribution for the accumulation noise. We propose a race Lévy flight model, with a racing architecture, making the model directly applicable to decision tasks with any number of alternatives. Moreover, with the corresponding space-fractional diffusion-advection equation for the accumulation process, a numerical scheme based on approximating of the joint probability distribution for each accumulator is provided. In addition, we fit our proposed model to two perceptual decision-making data sets, and show its improved performance compared to the standard racing diffusion model.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadian Rasanan, Amir Hosein & Evans, Nathan J. & Padash, Amin & Rad, Jamal Amani, 2022. "Race Lévy flights: A mathematically tractable framework for studying heavy-tailed accumulation noise," OSF Preprints x53hj, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:x53hj
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/x53hj
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6252a027840dd71c9c5c8275/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/x53hj?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clithero, John A., 2018. "Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 61-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konrad Grabiszewski & Alex Horenstein, 2022. "Profiling dynamic decision-makers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Fraser, Iain & Balcombe, Kelvin & Williams, Louis & McSorley, Eugene, 2021. "Preference stability in discrete choice experiments. Some evidence using eye-tracking," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    3. Grabiszewski, Konrad & Horenstein, Alex, 2022. "Measuring tree complexity with response times," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Bansal, Prateek & Kim, Eui-Jin & Ozdemir, Semra, 2024. "Discrete choice experiments with eye-tracking: How far we have come and ways forward," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Shuo Liu & Nick Netzer, 2023. "Happy Times: Measuring Happiness Using Response Times," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(12), pages 3289-3322, December.
    6. Lotito, Gianna & Migheli, Matteo & Ortona, Guido, 2019. "Some Experimental Evidence on Type Stability and Response Times," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201919, University of Turin.
    7. Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Oberholzer, Yvonne & Olschewski, Sebastian & Scheibehenne, Benjamin, 2024. "Complexity aversion in risky choices and valuations: Moderators and possible causes," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. Shen Li & Yuyang Zhang & Zhaolin Ren & Claire Liang & Na Li & Julie A. Shah, 2024. "Enhancing Preference-based Linear Bandits via Human Response Time," Papers 2409.05798, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    10. Duarte Gonc{c}alves, 2022. "Sequential Sampling Equilibrium," Papers 2212.07725, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:x53hj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.