IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/wt6vb.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trading is a losing game: An audit of deceptive choice architecture in demo-mode Contract for Difference (CFD) trading apps

Author

Listed:
  • ANDRADE, Maira
  • , Daniel Costa
  • Weiss-Cohen, Leonardo
  • Torrance, Jamie

    (Swansea University)

  • Newall, Philip Warren Stirling

    (University of Warwick)

Abstract

Mobile-based trading apps have made investing easier than ever before, but this includes enabling access to risky investments that many investors may not be able to trade safely. The UK financial regulator thereby requires Contract for Difference (CFD) trading apps to make disclosures such as, “89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider”. However, these disclosures might be counteracted by either their suboptimal implementation, or by other aspects of these apps’ deceptive choice architecture. Therefore, the present study audited choice architecture characteristics of demo-modes of the 14 most-popular CFD trading apps in the UK. A content analysis found for example that 31.6 per cent of risk warnings did not comply with the regulator’s standards, and that only 35.7 per cent of apps contained risk warnings within the app’s main tabs. A thematic analysis suggested that apps’ educational resources could instil users with the hope of winning, by emphasising practice, strategies, and psychological mindset – instead of acknowledging luck as the predominant factor underlying CFD trading profitability. Overall, this study added to previous research highlighting the similarities between certain high-risk investments and gambling, and added to the behavioural public policy literature on deceptive choice architecture.

Suggested Citation

  • ANDRADE, Maira & , Daniel Costa & Weiss-Cohen, Leonardo & Torrance, Jamie & Newall, Philip Warren Stirling, 2024. "Trading is a losing game: An audit of deceptive choice architecture in demo-mode Contract for Difference (CFD) trading apps," OSF Preprints wt6vb, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wt6vb
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wt6vb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/669f717d67add9d4c780d45c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wt6vb?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carl C. Scibetta, 2019. "Window Theory for Forex," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 1-2.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ANDRADE, Maira & , Daniel Costa & Weiss-Cohen, Leonardo & Torrance, Jamie & Newall, Philip, 2024. "Trading is a losing game: An audit of deceptive choice architecture in demo-mode Contract for Difference (CFD) trading apps," OSF Preprints wt6vb_v1, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wt6vb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.