IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/wt6vb.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trading is a losing game: An audit of deceptive choice architecture in demo-mode Contract for Difference (CFD) trading apps

Author

Listed:
  • ANDRADE, Maira
  • , Daniel Costa
  • Weiss-Cohen, Leonardo
  • Torrance, Jamie

    (Swansea University)

  • Newall, Philip Warren Stirling

    (University of Warwick)

Abstract

Mobile-based trading apps have made investing easier than ever before, but this includes enabling access to risky investments that many investors may not be able to trade safely. The UK financial regulator thereby requires Contract for Difference (CFD) trading apps to make disclosures such as, “89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider”. However, these disclosures might be counteracted by either their suboptimal implementation, or by other aspects of these apps’ deceptive choice architecture. Therefore, the present study audited choice architecture characteristics of demo-modes of the 14 most-popular CFD trading apps in the UK. A content analysis found for example that 31.6 per cent of risk warnings did not comply with the regulator’s standards, and that only 35.7 per cent of apps contained risk warnings within the app’s main tabs. A thematic analysis suggested that apps’ educational resources could instil users with the hope of winning, by emphasising practice, strategies, and psychological mindset – instead of acknowledging luck as the predominant factor underlying CFD trading profitability. Overall, this study added to previous research highlighting the similarities between certain high-risk investments and gambling, and added to the behavioural public policy literature on deceptive choice architecture.

Suggested Citation

  • ANDRADE, Maira & , Daniel Costa & Weiss-Cohen, Leonardo & Torrance, Jamie & Newall, Philip Warren Stirling, 2024. "Trading is a losing game: An audit of deceptive choice architecture in demo-mode Contract for Difference (CFD) trading apps," OSF Preprints wt6vb, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wt6vb
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wt6vb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/669f717d67add9d4c780d45c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wt6vb?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bauer, Rob & Cosemans, Mathijs & Eichholtz, Piet, 2009. "Option trading and individual investor performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 731-746, April.
    2. Carl C. Scibetta, 2019. "Window Theory for Forex," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 1-2.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee A. Smales & Zhangxin (Frank) Liu & Cameron D. Robertson, 2022. "One session options: Playing the announcement lottery?," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 192-211, February.
    2. Hoque, Ariful & Le, Thi & Hasan, Morshadul & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2024. "Does market efficiency matter for Shanghai 50 ETF index options?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    3. Entrop, Oliver & Fischer, Georg & McKenzie, Michael & Wilkens, Marco & Winkler, Christoph, 2016. "How does pricing affect investors’ product choice? Evidence from the market for discount certificates," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 195-215.
    4. Jonathan A. Milian, 2015. "Unsophisticated Arbitrageurs and Market Efficiency: Overreacting to a History of Underreaction?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 175-220, March.
    5. Piet Eichholtz & Erkan Yönder, 2015. "CEO Overconfidence, REIT Investment Activity and Performance," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 43(1), pages 139-162, March.
    6. Junmao Chiu & Huimin Chung & Keng-Yu Ho, 2014. "Fear Sentiment, Liquidity, and Trading Behavior: Evidence from the Index ETF Market," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-25.
    7. Baller, Stefanie & Entrop, Oliver & Schober, Alexander & Wilkens, Marco, 2017. "What drives performance in the speculative market of short-term exchange-traded retail products?," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe B-26-17, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    8. Wael DAMMAK, 2024. "Assessing Effect of Market Sentiment on Pricing of European Currency Options ‎," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(6), pages 1224-1244, June.
    9. Dammak, Wael & Hamad, Salah Ben & de Peretti, Christian & Eleuch, Hichem, 2023. "Pricing of European currency options considering the dynamic information costs," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    10. Avanidhar Subrahmanyam & Ke Tang & Jingyuan Wang & Xuewei Yang, 2024. "Leverage Is a Double‐Edged Sword," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(2), pages 1579-1634, April.
    11. Stephan Meyer & Sebastian Schroff & Christof Weinhardt, 2014. "(Un)skilled leveraged trading of retail investors," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 28(2), pages 111-138, May.
    12. Hu, Duni & Wang, Hailong, 2024. "Heterogeneous beliefs with preference interdependence and asset pricing," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 1-37.
    13. Adrian D. Lee & Shan Choy, 2014. "Contracts for dummies? The performance of investors in contracts for difference," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 54(3), pages 965-997, September.
    14. Ging-Ginq Pan & Yung-Ming Shiu & Tu-Cheng Wu, 2019. "Is trading in the shortest-term index options profitable?," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 169-201, April.
    15. Zghal, Imen & Ben Hamad, Salah & Eleuch, Hichem & Nobanee, Haitham, 2020. "The effect of market sentiment and information asymmetry on option pricing," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    16. Chockalingam, Arun & Feng, Haolin, 2015. "The implication of missing the optimal-exercise time of an American option," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 883-896.
    17. Lee, Jaeram & Ryu, Doojin & Yang, Heejin, 2021. "Does vega-neutral options trading contain information?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 294-314.
    18. Ting-Huan Chang, 2011. "Risk preference and trading motivation measurement due to moneyness: evidence from the S&P 500 Index option market," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(14), pages 1049-1057.
    19. Chuang, Wen-I & Susmel, Rauli, 2011. "Who is the more overconfident trader? Individual vs. institutional investors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1626-1644, July.
    20. Rodrigues, Luís Filipe & Oliveira, Abílio & Rodrigues, Helena & Costa, Carlos J., 2019. "Assessing consumer literacy on financial complex products," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 93-104.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wt6vb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.