IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/w2a4d_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Direct and indirect transactions and requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Coskun, Husna Betul
  • Coskun, Huseyin

Abstract

The indirect transactions between sectors of an economic system has been a long-standing open problem. There have been numerous attempts to conceptually define and mathematically formulate this notion in various other scientific fields in literature as well. The existing direct and indirect effects formulations, however, can neither determine the direct and indirect transactions separately nor quantify these transactions between two individual sectors of interest in a multisectoral economic system. The novel concepts of the direct, indirect and transfer (total) transactions between any two sectors are introduced, and the corresponding requirements matrices and coefficients are systematically formulated relative to both final demands and gross outputs based on the system decomposition theory in the present manuscript. It is demonstrated theoretically and through illustrative examples that the proposed requirements matrices accurately define and correctly quantify the corresponding direct, indirect, and total interactions and relationships. The proposed requirements matrices for the US economy using aggregated input-output tables for multiple years are then presented and briefly analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Coskun, Husna Betul & Coskun, Huseyin, 2019. "Direct and indirect transactions and requirements," OSF Preprints w2a4d_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:w2a4d_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/w2a4d_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5dd8f7f6fbde36000b900c1b/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/w2a4d_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parikh, A, 1975. "Various Definitions of Direct and Indirect Requirements in Input-Output Analysis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 57(3), pages 375-377, August.
    2. Jan Oosterhaven, 2007. "The net multiplier is a new key sector indicator: reply to De Mesnard’s comment," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 41(2), pages 273-283, June.
    3. Steenge, Albert E., 1990. "The commodity technology revisited : Theoretical basis and an application to error location in the make-use framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 376-387, October.
    4. Ferran Sancho, 2012. "Straightening out the concept of direct and indirect input requirements," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(1), pages 502-509.
    5. Louis De Mesnard, 2002. "NoteAbout the Concept of “Net Multipliers”," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 545-548, August.
    6. Jeong, Ki-Jun, 1984. "The relation between two different notions of direct and indirect input requirements," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 473-476.
    7. Gim, Ho Un & Kim, Koonchan, 1998. "The General Relation between Two Different Notions of Direct and Indirect Input Requirements," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 199-208, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erik Dietzenbacher & Manfred Lenzen & Bart Los & Dabo Guan & Michael L. Lahr & Ferran Sancho & Sangwon Suh & Cuihong Yang, 2013. "Input--Output Analysis: The Next 25 Years," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 369-389, December.
    2. Ferran Sancho, 2013. "Some conceptual difficulties regarding ‘net’ multipliers," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 51(2), pages 537-552, October.
    3. Hu Un Gim & Koonchan Kim, 2008. "Note on the Decomposition by Factors in Direct AND Indirect Requirements," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 24, pages 259-282.
    4. Gunnar Lindberg, 2011. "On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers," ERSA conference papers ersa10p800, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Ferran Sancho, 2012. "Straightening out the concept of direct and indirect input requirements," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(1), pages 502-509.
    6. Lenzen, Manfred & Murray, Joy & Sack, Fabian & Wiedmann, Thomas, 2007. "Shared producer and consumer responsibility -- Theory and practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 27-42, February.
    7. Husna Betul Coskun & Huseyin Coskun, 2019. "Direct and indirect transactions and requirements," Papers 1911.11569, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    8. Coskun, Husna Betul, 2019. "Direct and indirect transactions and requirements," OSF Preprints w2a4d, Center for Open Science.
    9. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-132 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Louis Mesnard, 2007. "Reply to Oosterhaven’s: the net multiplier is a new key sector indicator," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 41(2), pages 285-296, June.
    11. Suh, Sangwon, 2004. "Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 451-467, April.
    12. Takao Fujimoto & Yukihiko Fujita, 2008. "A Refutation Of The Commodity Exploitation Theorem," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 530-540, July.
    13. George Soklis, 2009. "The Conversion of the Supply and Use Tables to Symmetric Input-Output Tables: A Critical Review," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 3(1), pages 51-70, June.
    14. Thijs ten Raa & José Manuel Rueda-Cantuche, 2009. "The Construction of Input–Output Coefficients Matrices in an Axiomatic Context: Some Further Considerations," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 6, pages 77-101, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    15. Oosterhaven, Jan, 2017. "Key Sector Analysis," Research Report 17015-GEM, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Caroline Hambye, 2012. "Working Paper 12-12 - Analyse entrées-sorties - Modèles, Multiplicateurs, Linkages [Working Paper 12-12 - Input-outputanalyse - Modellen, Multiplicatoren, Linkages]," Working Papers 1212, Federal Planning Bureau, Belgium.
    17. Suh, Sangwon, 2004. "A note on the calculus for physical input-output analysis and its application to land appropriation of international trade activities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-17, January.
    18. repec:rre:publsh:v:34:y:2004:i:1:p:57-71 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Ferran Sancho, 2012. "The Role Of Supply Constraints In Multiplier Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 21-34, June.
    20. Clio Ciaschini & Margherita Carlucci & Francesco Maria Chelli & Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica & Luca Salvati, 2022. "The Industrial Pattern of Italian Regions: A Disaggregated Sectoral Analysis Based on Input–Output Tables," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.
    21. Elio Londero, 1999. "Secondary Products, By-products and the Commodity Technology Assumption," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 195-203.
    22. Takao Fujimoto & Arrigo Opocher, 2010. "Commodity Content In A General Input–Output Model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 442-453, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:w2a4d_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.