IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/vnf2s_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Symbiosis of Gothic and Narrative: A Comparative Study of Lovecraft and Hedayat

Author

Listed:
  • Madandar Arani, Sara

Abstract

As contemporaneous writers, Howard Phillips Lovecraft and Sadegh Hedayat’s Gothic fiction has been concerned with a dramatization of the hidden fears of characters; however, their narratives go beyond a mere representation of human woes. This study explores how both authors write about minds polluted by fear, anxiety, and return of the repressed, and simultaneously reflect these afflictions in their narrative structures. Edgar Allan Poe’s Gothic tradition influenced both authors, despite their distinct cultural and geographical contexts, revealing that while Lovecraft’s Gothic leans toward cosmic horror and Hedayat’s toward realism, both are unified by a humanistic core and a profound engagement with the uncanny. In both authors’ works, upon the resurgence of the Freudian uncanny in the narrated world a concomitant shockwave is sent back onto the narrative plane, representing the depicted psychological fragmentation of the characters. This article examines how their narratives act as a symbiotic extension of the Gothic worlds they create, demonstrating how the experience of the uncanny disrupts the narrative structure, influencing both its temporality and emplotment. Through their shared narrative strategies as well as their stylistic divergences the Gothic emerges as a medium capable of transcending cultural boundaries and addressing modern anxieties.

Suggested Citation

  • Madandar Arani, Sara, 2025. "Symbiosis of Gothic and Narrative: A Comparative Study of Lovecraft and Hedayat," OSF Preprints vnf2s_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:vnf2s_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/vnf2s_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6744f505d3a6dda607ac1ed5/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/vnf2s_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:vnf2s_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.