IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/tqnzx.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industrial Development in Fisheries Based on Blue Economy of Tominy Bay

Author

Listed:
  • Wolok, Eduart
  • Yapanto, Lis M

    (Universitas Negeri Gorontalo)

  • Olii, Abdul Hafidz
  • Tanipu, Funco

Abstract

The participatory prospective analysis aims to determine critical variables in the development of the sustainable fishing industry according to the blue economy concept—a further study in management policy. The fishery management in Fish Landing Ports and Fish Halls has not applied the blue economy approach yet, thus its waste utilization. The participatory prospective analysis approach in determining the management policy by organizing consignment by relevant stakeholders such as Department of Marine and Fisheries of Gorontalo Province, Department of Marine and Fisheries of Gorontalo City, Chief Operating of PPI Tenda Gorontalo City, Fishery industry, fishermen of Gorontalo City and TPI(Fish auction) Gorontalo City. The is symbolizes four main variables of policymaking: environmentally friendly, cooperation in togetherness, industrial increase, and zero waste participatory, prospective analysis, skipjack, blue economy, tuna fisheries industry, fisheries waste, tuna mackerel.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolok, Eduart & Yapanto, Lis M & Olii, Abdul Hafidz & Tanipu, Funco, 2021. "Industrial Development in Fisheries Based on Blue Economy of Tominy Bay," OSF Preprints tqnzx, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tqnzx
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/tqnzx
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/607bede3c29ca80206eba16b/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/tqnzx?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Human, Brett A. & Davies, Amanda, 2010. "Stakeholder consultation during the planning phase of scientific programs," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 645-654, May.
    2. Gray, Tim & Hatchard, Jenny, 2008. "A complicated relationship: Stakeholder participation and the ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 158-168, March.
    3. Yapanto, Lis M, 2021. "Supply chain management and logistic presentation: Mediation effect of competitive advantage," OSF Preprints ze96v, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolus, Johannes Friedrich & Hanley, Nick & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Pedersen, Søren Marcus, 2018. "A Bottom-up Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 282-295.
    2. Bailey, Jennifer, 2016. "Adventures in cross-disciplinary studies: Grand strategy and fisheries management," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 18-27.
    3. Kinell, Gerda & Söderqvist, Tore & Elmgren, Ragnar & Walve, Jacob & Franzén, Frida, 2012. "Cost-Benefit Analysis in a Framework of Stakeholder Involvement and Integrated Coastal Zone Modeling," CERE Working Papers 2012:1, CERE - the Center for Environmental and Resource Economics.
    4. Scemama, Pierre & Mongruel, Rémi & Kermagoret, Charlène & Bailly, Denis & Carlier, Antoine & Mao, Patrick Le & Vaschalde, et Diane, 2022. "Guidance for stakeholder consultation to support national ecosystem services assessment: A case study from French marine assessment," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    5. Trenkel, Verena M. & Hintzen, Niels T. & Farnsworth, Keith D. & Olesen, Christian & Reid, David & Rindorf, Anna & Shephard, Samuel & Dickey-Collas, Mark, 2015. "Identifying marine pelagic ecosystem management objectives and indicators," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 23-32.
    6. Burmester, Brent, 2016. "Upgrading or unhelpful? Defiant corporate support for a marine protected area," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 206-212.
    7. Tim S. Gray & Thomas L. Catchpole, 2021. "The Relation between Fisheries–Science Partnerships and Co-Management: A Case Study of EU Discards Survival Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Ana Mehak & Yongtong Mu & Muhammad Mohsin & Xing-Can Zhang, 2023. "MCDM-Based Ranking and Prioritization of Fisheries’ Risks: A Case Study of Sindh, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Qiu Qiu & Liping Dai & Helena F. M. W. Van Rijswick & Gang Tu, 2021. "Improving the Water Quality Monitoring System in the Yangtze River Basin—Legal Suggestions to the Implementation of the Yangtze River Protection Law," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Kraan, Marloes & Hendriksen, Astrid & van Hoof, Luc & van Leeuwen, Judith & Jouanneau, Charlène, 2014. "How to dance? The tango of stakeholder involvement in marine governance research," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PB), pages 347-352.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tqnzx. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.