IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/r63uz.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rise of the Most Excellent Scholar, Demise of the Field: A Fictional Story, Yet Probable Destiny

Author

Listed:
  • Orhan, Mehmet A.

    (EM Normandie Business School)

  • Bal, P. Matthijs
  • van Rossenberg, Yvonne

Abstract

This article presents a fictional narrative about Professor Sackker, the solitary researcher in the field of Sackker Studies, once known as Management and Organizational Studies. Despite its absurdity, the story portrays Sackker’s dominance, marked by his inevitable rise with record-breaking publications and citations, stifling competition, and leaving him as the ultimate winner and ruler. Through personal reflections, his story explores his career strategies, provides insights into his success, and explains how he shaped, transformed, and eventually (but unwittingly) destroyed the field. This narrative, though fictional, mirrors real concerns in today’s reality: growing inequalities, the dominance of elite scholars, and erosion of meaning in academic careers as a function of hyper-competition. We examine the prevalence of systemic issues plaguing academia. Despite challenges, the article also aims to inspire hope. By illuminating these problems and integrating them into scholarly discussions, there lies an opportunity for change, empowering the next generation of academics.

Suggested Citation

  • Orhan, Mehmet A. & Bal, P. Matthijs & van Rossenberg, Yvonne, 2024. "Rise of the Most Excellent Scholar, Demise of the Field: A Fictional Story, Yet Probable Destiny," OSF Preprints r63uz, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:r63uz
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/r63uz
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66a229b92b2fb0799c2406cb/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/r63uz?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:r63uz. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.