IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/qj85m.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutional factors influencing knowledge production for practice: Evidence from nonprofit studies

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Ji

    (The University of Texas at Austin)

  • Ovalle, Joycelyn
  • Wang, Yan

Abstract

This study theorizes and tests an institutional-logics framework to explain why some universities produce more practical knowledge than others using nonprofit studies as an example. Empirically, knowledge production for practice can be increased by (1) graduate degree programs with an emphasis on nonprofit management, (2) research centers on nonprofit studies, and (3) location in disadvantaged communities; however, (4) status as an R1 or R2 research university substantially decreases the production of practical knowledge. Furthermore, (5) research centers can mediate the influence of community needs on knowledge production, so that universities with nonprofit research centers are more responsive to solving community issues. Theoretically, knowledge production follows the institutional logics of both closed and open systems, and institutions such as research centers that can repackage the culture of open systems to make it acceptable to closed systems are essential mediators.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Ji & Ovalle, Joycelyn & Wang, Yan, 2023. "Institutional factors influencing knowledge production for practice: Evidence from nonprofit studies," OSF Preprints qj85m, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:qj85m
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/qj85m
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6499d4e938091109f03c2ac0/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/qj85m?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:qj85m. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.