IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/qfcpx.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

"This is Transparency to Me" User Insights into Recommendation Algorithm Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Luria, Michal

Abstract

Supplemental Materials - "This Transparency To Me" Research Prototypes - https://cdt.org/insights/this-is-transparency-to-me-research-prototypes/ Recommendation algorithms by and large determine what people see on social media. But what exactly should platforms share with users about recommendation algorithms that would be meaningful to them? Prior research efforts have looked into frameworks for explainability of algorithms as well as design features across social media platforms that can contribute to their transparency and accountability. We build on these efforts to explore what a recommendation algorithm transparency report may include and how it could present information to users. In this report we conducted a two-part, human-centered co-design research project. In Study 1, participants were invited to participate in several design activities aimed at creating a reflective process about their needs and desires. In Study 2, the same participants were invited to examine the manifestations of their and other users’ own ideas, and to reflect on the strengths and drawbacks these prototypes suggest. Based on the interviews from both studies, we develop guidance about recommendation algorithm reports: what they should include, what aspects they should emphasize, and how they should be communicated.

Suggested Citation

  • Luria, Michal, 2022. ""This is Transparency to Me" User Insights into Recommendation Algorithm Reporting," OSF Preprints qfcpx, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:qfcpx
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/qfcpx
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/648a2058dc523b02dfdb5402/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/qfcpx?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:qfcpx. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.