IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/hdae5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: An Analysis of the UK Government's Counter-Narrative Strategy in the Fight Against Online Extremist Narratives

Author

Listed:
  • O'Connell, Michael

Abstract

This thesis critically examines the UK government's counter-narrative strategy for addressing online extremist narratives, comparing it with best practices and recommendations from academic literature. Amidst increasing criticism regarding the efficacy and theoretical underpinnings of such strategies, this thesis develops a theoretical framework incorporating insights from sociology, communication studies, and psychology to establish comparative criteria for effective counter-narrative approaches. Analysis of the UK's strategy reveals an implicit acknowledgment of the importance of context, filtering, and the integration of online and offline spaces. However, the incorporation of other academic insights and psychology-based policies remains unclear. The thesis underscores the importance of greater transparency in the policy space to enable the evaluation of counter-narrative strategies in instigating behavioural and attitudinal change among target audiences. The thesis also emphasises the significance of exploring inoculation as a proactive approach in Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) strategies. Inoculation-based approaches should be incorporated as an integral component of the counter-narrative toolkit. Doing so could foster a more resilient and proactive stance against extremist narratives at the individual level. Future research should focus on understanding the impact of counter-narrative approaches and their alignment with other academic recommendations to ensure the development of more robust and evidence-based strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Connell, Michael, 2023. "Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: An Analysis of the UK Government's Counter-Narrative Strategy in the Fight Against Online Extremist Narratives," OSF Preprints hdae5, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hdae5
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/hdae5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6513064843df320122b62885/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/hdae5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah L. Carthy & Colm B. Doody & Katie Cox & Denis O'Hora & Kiran M. Sarma, 2020. "Counter‐narratives for the prevention of violent radicalisation: A systematic review of targeted interventions," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Wolfowicz & Badi Hasisi & David Weisburd, 2022. "What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    2. Michael Wolfowicz & Badi Hasisi & David Weisburd, 2021. "PROTOCOL: What are the effects of different elements of media on radicalization outcomes? A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), March.
    3. Peter Neyroud & Ajmal Aziz & Brett Kubicek, 2024. "Update on Campbell's Countering Violent Extremism programme," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    4. Kiran M. Sarma & Sarah L. Carthy & Katie M. Cox, 2022. "PROTOCOL: Mental disorder, psychological problems and terrorist behaviour: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    5. Howard White, 2022. "Getting evidence into use: The experience of the Campbell Collaboration," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), March.
    6. Michelle Sydes & Lorelei Hine & Angela Higginson & James McEwan & Laura Dugan & Lorraine Mazerolle, 2023. "Criminal justice interventions for preventing radicalisation, violent extremism and terrorism: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), December.
    7. Kiran M. Sarma & Sarah L. Carthy & Katie M. Cox, 2022. "Mental disorder, psychological problems and terrorist behaviour: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:hdae5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.