Author
Listed:
- Patel, Shrujna
- Boulton, Kelsie
- Redoblado-Hodge, Antoinette
- Papanicolaou, Angela
- Barnett, Diana
- Bennett, Beverley
- Drevensek, Suzi
- Cramsie, Jane
- Ganesalingam, Kalaichelvi
- Ong, Natalie
Abstract
Background: There is a growing need for cost-efficient and patient-centred approaches to support families in hospital and community-based neurodevelopmental services. For such purposes, electronic data collection (EDC) may hold advantages over paper-based data collection. Such EDC approaches enable automated data collection for scoring and interpretation, saving time for clinicians and services and promoting more efficient service delivery. Objective: The current pilot study evaluated the efficacy of EDC for the Child Development Unit, a hospital-based diagnostic assessment clinic in the Sydney Children’s Hospital Network. Caregiver response rates and preference for EDC or paper-based methods were evaluated as well as the moderating role of demographic characteristics such as age, level of education and ethnic background. Methods: Families were sent either a paper-based questionnaire via post or an electronic mail link for completion before attending their first onsite clinic appointment for assessment. A total of 62 families were provided a paper version of the questionnaire, while 184 families were provided the online version of the same questionnaire. Results: Completion rates of the questionnaire before the first appointment were significantly higher for EDC (89.1%) in comparison to paper-based methods (38.7%; P <.001). Within the EDC group, a vast majority of respondents indicated a preference for completing the questionnaires online (87.3%), compared to paper completion (12.7%; P <.001). Of the caregiver demographic characteristics, only the respondent’s level of education was associated with modality preference, such that those with a higher level of education reported a greater preference for EDC (P = .04). Conclusions: These results show that EDC is feasible in hospital-based clinics and has the potential to offer substantial benefits in terms of centralised data collation, time and cost savings, efficiency of service and resource allocation. The results of this study therefore support the continued use of electronic methods to improve family-centred care in clinical practices.
Suggested Citation
Patel, Shrujna & Boulton, Kelsie & Redoblado-Hodge, Antoinette & Papanicolaou, Angela & Barnett, Diana & Bennett, Beverley & Drevensek, Suzi & Cramsie, Jane & Ganesalingam, Kalaichelvi & Ong, Natalie, 2020.
"The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: A Pilot Study,"
OSF Preprints
gvbxe, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gvbxe
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/gvbxe
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:gvbxe. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.