IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/dqt4u.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Overcoming heuristics that hinder people’s acceptance of climate-change-mitigation technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Bloebaum, Anke
  • Schmidt, Karolin
  • Böcher, Michael
  • Arlinghaus, Julia
  • Krause, Friederike
  • Matthies, Ellen

Abstract

The overall research objective of the present study is the investigation of the effects of a strongly expressed restriction-oriented climate change mitigation heuristic (SER heuristic) on people's attitudes towards and acceptance of climate change mitigation technologies such as Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU). Furthermore, we want to examine the effects of a scenario-based communication intervention approach on the promotion of a supportive attitude towards and acceptance of CCU, especially referring to people characterized by a SER heuristic. Against this background, we present empirical findings based on an online experiment including a scenario-based intervention in an initial sample of 401 German participants. In line with our expectations, our findings show that participants characterized by a SER heuristic report a significantly lower supportive attitude towards CCU as well as a lower acceptance of CCU, compared to participants who are not characterized by a SER heuristic. Furthermore, our findings imply the examined scenario-based communication intervention approach to be an effective tool for the promotion of participants’ supportive attitudes towards CCU and acceptance of CCU. Taken together, the present study provides further valuable insights for the promotion of people’s supportive attitude towards as well as of their acceptance of necessary new climate change mitigation technologies such as CCU.

Suggested Citation

  • Bloebaum, Anke & Schmidt, Karolin & Böcher, Michael & Arlinghaus, Julia & Krause, Friederike & Matthies, Ellen, 2024. "Overcoming heuristics that hinder people’s acceptance of climate-change-mitigation technologies," OSF Preprints dqt4u, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:dqt4u
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dqt4u
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/668f7d9697fcbf01a4851fcd/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/dqt4u?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schmidt, Karolin & Kösling, Philipp & Bamberg, Sebastian & Blöbaum, Anke, 2022. "A Prospect Theory-based experimental vignette methodology for exploring rebound effects and rebound-damping interventions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Ellen Matthies & Theresa de Paula Sieverding & Lukas Engel & Anke Blöbaum, 2023. "Simple and Smart: Investigating Two Heuristics That Guide the Intention to Engage in Different Climate-Change-Mitigation Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Chad M. Baum & Livia Fritz & Sean Low & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2024. "Public perceptions and support of climate intervention technologies across the Global North and Global South," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Mohamad Hjeij & Arnis Vilks, 2023. "A brief history of heuristics: how did research on heuristics evolve?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Martina Perišić & Ernest Barceló & Katarina Dimic-Misic & Monireh Imani & Vesna Spasojević Brkić, 2022. "The Role of Bioeconomy in the Future Energy Scenario: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Santa, Juana Castro & Drews, Stefan, 2023. "Heuristic processing of green advertising: Review and policy implications," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Schmelzer, Matthias, 2017. "‘Born in the corridors of the OECD’: the forgotten origins of the Club of Rome, transnational networks, and the 1970s in global history," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 26-48, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Lourdes Ordoñez Olivo & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Shaping the Knowledge Base of Bioeconomy Sectors Development in Latin American and Caribbean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Melo, Grace & Palma, Marco A. & Ribera, Luis A., 2024. "Are experts overoptimistic about the success of food market labeling information?," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343870, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Carolina Sánchez & Enrique Carlos Bianchi & Carla Rodriguez-Sanchez & Franco Sancho-Esper, 2024. "Are advertising campaigns for water conservation in Latin America persuasive? A mixed-method approach," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(2), pages 341-369, June.
    4. Fatih Selimefendigil & Ceylin Şirin & Hakan F. Öztop, 2022. "Experimental Performance Analysis of a Solar Desalination System Modified with Natural Dolomite Powder Integrated Latent Heat Thermal Storage Unit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Zhang, Zhian & Tang, Jiayi & Ye, Ziyu, 2023. "New evidence of the relationship between media, culture industry, and mineral efficiency in high and low income asian economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    6. Md Sumon Reza & Zhanar Baktybaevna Iskakova & Shammya Afroze & Kairat Kuterbekov & Asset Kabyshev & Kenzhebatyr Zh. Bekmyrza & Marzhan M. Kubenova & Muhammad Saifullah Abu Bakar & Abul K. Azad & Hrido, 2023. "Influence of Catalyst on the Yield and Quality of Bio-Oil for the Catalytic Pyrolysis of Biomass: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-39, July.
    7. Jacopo Bonasera, 2022. "Un-Common Nature. Neo-malthusian Environmentalism before 1972 UN Stockholm Conference," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 56(2), pages 7-26, December.
    8. Santos Júnior, Edvaldo Pereira & Silva, Magno Vamberto Batista da & Simioni, Flávio José & Rotella Junior, Paulo & Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar & Coelho Junior, Luiz Moreira, 2022. "Location and concentration of the forest bioelectricity supply in Brazil: A space-time analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 710-719.
    9. Theresa de Paula Sieverding & Vanessa Kulcar & Karolin Schmidt, 2024. "Act like There Is a Tomorrow—Contact and Affinity with Younger People and Legacy Motivation as Predictors of Climate Protection among Older People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Lubov Petrichenko & Antans Sauhats & Illia Diahovchenko & Irina Segeda, 2022. "Economic Viability of Energy Communities versus Distributed Prosumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Yahdih Semlali & Musaddag Elrayah & Mekimah Sabri & Zighed Rahma & Ismail Bengana, 2024. "How Can Industrial SMEs Achieve Sustainability through Cleaner Production? Green Marketing’s Role as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-25, October.
    12. Delphine Pouchain & Emmanuel Petit & Jérôme Ballet, 2023. "Changement climatique, colère et rationalité. Réflexions à la lumière de l’économie comportementale et du pragmatisme de John Dewey," Post-Print hal-04441881, HAL.
    13. Mathieu Gomes & Sylvain Marsat & Jonathan Peillex & Guillaume Pijourlet, 2023. "Does religiosity influence corporate greenwashing behavior?," Papers 2312.14515, arXiv.org.
    14. Leonardi, Emanuele, 2019. "Bringing Class Analysis Back in: Assessing the Transformation of the Value-Nature Nexus to Strengthen the Connection Between Degrowth and Environmental Justice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 83-90.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:dqt4u. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.