IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/bg2uq_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards a decentralized geospatial web — risks and opportunities for GIScience

Author

Listed:
  • Hoopes, John
  • Oshan, Taylor M.

Abstract

The application of decentralized web technologies and design principles within GIScience remains underexplored. We examine potential pitfalls and opportunities at their intersection, and propose three pillars for a decentralized geospatial web: Proof-of-Location, Verifiable Geocomputation, and Peer-to-Peer Spatial Data Management. These technologies offer cryptographically robust ways to validate location claims, ensure tamper-resistant geospatial analyses, and empower user-centric data ownership, with potential for wide-ranging impact for individuals, governments and the private sector across many application domains. Although challenges remain, from platform immaturity to reputational stigma, these pillars may pave the way for more resilient, fair, and trustworthy geospatial ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoopes, John & Oshan, Taylor M., 2025. "Towards a decentralized geospatial web — risks and opportunities for GIScience," OSF Preprints bg2uq_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:bg2uq_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/bg2uq_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/679d1060d9a6f684e6f4f10d/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/bg2uq_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Zook, 2023. "Platforms, blockchains and the challenges of decentralization," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 367-372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Davies & Betsy Donald & Mia Gray, 2023. "The power of platforms—precarity and place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 245-256.
    2. Igor Calzada, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence for Social Innovation: Beyond the Noise of Algorithms and Datafication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-25, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:bg2uq_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.