IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/afp2s.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Institutionalization of Legal Ethics in South Africa: The Double Movement of Profession and Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Klaaren, Jonathan

Abstract

This chapter investigates how legal ethics have been institutionalized in South Africa. The account given spans from the post-apartheid heyday of the 1990s to 2018 through to the present day. 2018 was the year in which the Legal Practice Act 28 of 2014 was finally brought into more or less full effect (even if not institutionally implemented) – aiming to put the governance and institutions of South Africa’s legal profession onto a new legal foundation. This chapter’s focus is thus on institutionalization of legal ethics as part of and subsequent to the transition from apartheid to South Africa’s current constitutional democracy. Legal ethics develops as a regulatory field and a research topic in different ways in different regimes. In South Africa, key actors in the post-apartheid development include the law deans (not directly subject to the profession) and the leaders of the profession in practice, in particular those from the sub-field of attorneys. Since the transition to constitutional democracy, a dialectical process has played out between legal education and the organized legal profession over the prominence and place of legal ethics. Tied up with a slow pace of institutionalization, neither sub-field has demonstrated much change on the ground and this double movement shows little sign of abating.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaaren, Jonathan, 2024. "The Institutionalization of Legal Ethics in South Africa: The Double Movement of Profession and Higher Education," OSF Preprints afp2s, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:afp2s
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/afp2s
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/66f05f3a574526527f49a8bd/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/afp2s?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:afp2s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.