IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/acb2f.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fundamental Flaws in Academic, Employment and Professional Tests: Test Score Misuses Are Responsible for Ruined Student Health, Social Injustice and Diminished Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Jianqing

Abstract

In this research, I investigate inherent limitations in school tests and employment tests. I found there is no statistical distribution and no defined observation for test scores. One problem is that personal knowledge must have different substances, degrees and scopes notwithstanding contrary unproved hypotheses. No real test data support the claim that human knowledge follows a well known distribution. A related but more fatal problem is that points of individual questions are assigned arbitrarily, and different points for individual test questions represent things that differ in nature, scope and significance. There is no valid basis for adding points up to arrive at an objective test score. Those findings are strongly backed up by very poor test scores in published studies. Without understanding both flaws in near a century, test scores have been improperly used as ranking parameters and passing criteria. While grades ware kept as secret in early time, the letter grading system became the standard in the U.S. in the 1940’s. Without exploring deep flaws in GPAs, GPAs are improperly used as artificial impediments to student careers. A natural response to the abuse of GPAs is cheating in test to neutralize their unfair effects. Misuse of test scores and GPAs are responsible for the vicious competition, and cheating by some students must force others to do the same. A century of abuse of test scores and GPAs have fostered a cheating culture in the U.S., which fuels a huge international cheating service industry. Now cheating was found among nearly 70% U.S. college students, nearly 90% of high school students, and a good portion of job applicants. This cheating culture and score-based employment practices are about to ruin everything from social justice, fair employment opportunities, U.S. legal process legitimacy, student health, and U.S. competitiveness. Measures for rooting out this cancer must be to reform the test system, change employment practices and eliminate the motivation of cheating.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Jianqing, 2021. "Fundamental Flaws in Academic, Employment and Professional Tests: Test Score Misuses Are Responsible for Ruined Student Health, Social Injustice and Diminished Competitiveness," OSF Preprints acb2f, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:acb2f
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/acb2f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/60a05b6b3b0d2c007472edb3/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/acb2f?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:acb2f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.