IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/8xg2e_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Administrative Burdens as Barriers to Afforestation: A Sludge Audit of Ireland’s Afforestation Scheme

Author

Listed:
  • Lades, Leonhard
  • Lentz, Patricia
  • Augustenborg, Cara

Abstract

Many governments offer financial incentives to encourage landowners to plant trees. However, administrative burdens associated with these afforestation schemes can hinder grant uptake. This paper builds on existing research on administrative burdens and “sludge,” which addresses these administrative challenges, by conducting a sludge audit of Ireland’s Afforestation Scheme. We create a journey map that outlines the typical steps involved in securing afforestation grants, assess the level and type of sludge at each step in this process, and conduct a thematic qualitative analysis of stakeholder interviews. The audit reveals that unpredictable timelines in the application process serve as a significant barrier to afforestation efforts. Additionally, the high level of uncertainty surrounding grant application outcomes complicates the decision-making process for landowners, making it challenging to determine whether pursuing the scheme is worthwhile. To address these challenges, we recommend streamlining information requirements, establishing clear timelines, and enhancing communication to reduce friction and facilitate afforestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lades, Leonhard & Lentz, Patricia & Augustenborg, Cara, 2025. "Administrative Burdens as Barriers to Afforestation: A Sludge Audit of Ireland’s Afforestation Scheme," OSF Preprints 8xg2e_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:8xg2e_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8xg2e_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/67fe30c16bddf38489c1088c/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/8xg2e_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:8xg2e_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.